While AI tools once gave creators an edge, they now risk producing democratized, undifferentiated output. IBM's AI VP, who grew to 200k followers, now uses AI less. The new edge is spending more time on unique human thinking and using AI only for initial ideation, not final writing.
Related Insights
In the age of AI, the new standard for value is the "GPT Test." If a person's public statements, writing, or ideas could have been generated by a large language model, they will fail to stand out. This places an immense premium on true originality, deep insight, and an authentic voice—the very things AI struggles to replicate.
A powerful workflow is to explicitly instruct your AI to act as a collaborative thinking partner—asking questions and organizing thoughts—while strictly forbidding it from creating final artifacts. This separates the crucial thinking phase from the generative phase, leading to better outcomes.
True creative mastery emerges from an unpredictable human process. AI can generate options quickly but bypasses this journey, losing the potential for inexplicable, last-minute genius that defines truly great work. It optimizes for speed at the cost of brilliance.
The true danger of LLMs in the workplace isn't just sloppy output, but the erosion of deep thinking. The arduous process of writing forces structured, first-principles reasoning. By making it easy to generate plausible text from bullet points, LLMs allow users to bypass this critical thinking process, leading to shallower insights.
As AI-generated content creates a sea of sameness, audiences will seek what machines cannot replicate: genuine emotion and deep, personal narrative. This will drive a creator-led shift toward more meaningful, long-form content that offers a real human connection.
Don't use AI to generate generic thought leadership, which often just regurgitates existing content. The real power is using AI as a 'steroid' for your own ideas. Architect the core content yourself, then use AI to turbocharge research and data integration to make it 10x better.
Most AI writing tools produce generic content. Spiral was rebuilt to act as a partner. It first interviews the user to understand their thoughts and taste, helping them think more deeply before generating drafts. This collaborative process avoids "slop" and leads to more authentic writing.
The desire for perfection and control is a bottleneck in the AI era. Marketers who insist on reviewing every word of AI-generated copy will fall behind. The new critical skill is not writing perfect copy, but engineering and continuously improving the prompts that generate it at scale. It's a mindset shift from creator to system designer.
When AI automates a core task like content writing, don't eliminate the role. Instead, reframe it to leverage human judgment. A "content writer" can be transformed into a "content curator" who guides, edits, and validates AI-generated output. This shifts the focus from replacement to augmentation.
AI should not be the starting point for creation, as that leads to generic, spam-like output. Instead, begin with a distinct human point of view and strategy. Then, leverage AI to scale that unique perspective, personalize it with data, and amplify its distribution.
