Current rate cuts, intended as risk management, are not a one-way street. By stimulating the economy, they raise the probability that the Fed will need to reverse course and hike rates later to manage potential outperformance, creating a "two-sided" risk distribution for investors.
Related Insights
While lower rates seem beneficial for leveraged companies, the context is critical. The Federal Reserve typically cuts rates in response to a weakening economy. This economic downturn usually harms issuer fundamentals more than the lower borrowing costs can help, making rate-cutting cycles a net negative for high-yield credit.
The widely expected 25 basis point rate cut was overshadowed by two dissents—one for a larger cut and one for holding rates steady. This internal division, along with four reserve banks requesting no discount rate change, signals significant uncertainty and disagreement within the Fed about the future path of monetary policy.
The Fed's data-dependent policy is hamstrung by the government shutdown. If the shutdown persists, the lack of data itself becomes a signal of economic harm, potentially forcing the Fed to implement an "insurance" rate cut based on assumption rather than evidence.
Due to massive government debt, the Fed's tools work paradoxically. Raising rates increases the deficit via higher interest payments, which is stimulative. Cutting rates is also inherently stimulative. The Fed is no longer controlling inflation but merely choosing the path through which it occurs.
The market is pricing in approximately three more rate cuts for next year, totaling around 110 basis points. However, J.P. Morgan's analysis, supported by the Fed's own dot plot, suggests only one additional cut is likely, indicating that current market pricing for easing is too aggressive.
The upcoming FOMC meeting is a crucial inflection point. A rate cut will focus investors on the timing of subsequent cuts. A hold will pivot the conversation to whether the easing cycle is over and if rate hikes could return in 2026, dramatically impacting Treasury markets.
Even if US inflation remains stubbornly high, the US dollar's potential to appreciate is capped by the Federal Reserve's asymmetric reaction function. The Fed is operating under a risk management framework where it is more inclined to ease on economic weakness than to react hawkishly to firm inflation, limiting terminal rate repricing.
Robert Kaplan argues that with inflation at 2.75-3%, the neutral Fed funds rate is ~3.5-3.75%. Since the current rate is 3.75-4%, another cut would place policy at neutral, not accommodative. This is a risky position when inflation remains well above the 2% target, leaving no room for error.
The Fed's recent hawkish comments are likely a communication strategy to manage market certainty about a December rate cut, rather than a fundamental policy shift. The firm's economist still anticipates a cut, and the market prices in three cuts over 12 months, suggesting the overall easing backdrop remains intact for Emerging Markets.
The FOMC's recent rate cut marks the end of preemptive, "risk management" cuts designed to insure against potential future risks. Future policy changes will now be strictly reactive, depending on incoming economic data. This is a critical shift in the Fed's reaction function that changes the calculus for predicting future moves.