Navan's post-IPO stock drop, despite strong revenue, is a troubling sign for the venture ecosystem. It highlights that even a multi-billion-dollar outcome can be considered a 'bummer' and may not generate sufficient returns for large, late-stage funds, resetting expectations for what constitutes a truly successful exit in the current market.

The traditional IPO exit is being replaced by a perpetual secondary market for elite private companies. This new paradigm provides liquidity for investors and employees without the high costs and regulatory burdens of going public. This shift fundamentally alters the venture capital lifecycle, enabling longer private holding periods.

In the current market, companies prioritize liquidity and public market access over protecting previous private valuations. A lower IPO price is no longer seen as a failure but as a necessary market correction to move forward and ensure survival.

As high-growth tech companies delay IPOs, the public small-cap market is left with lower-quality assets. The return on invested capital (ROIC) for the Russell 2500 index has more than halved over 30 years, signaling a fundamental shift for institutional investors.

The current IPO market is bifurcated. Investors are unenthusiastic about solid, VC-backed companies in the $5-$15B valuation range, leading to poor post-IPO performance. However, there is immense pent-up demand for a handful of mega-private companies like SpaceX and OpenAI.

The dot-com era saw ~2,000 companies go public, but only a dozen survived meaningfully. The current AI wave will likely follow a similar pattern, with most companies failing or being acquired despite the hype. Founders should prepare for this reality by considering their exit strategy early.

The venture capital industry invests $150-200B annually. To generate reasonable returns (3.5-4x), it needs over $700B in exit value each year. This translates to an unrealistic 40 exits of Figma's scale ($25B) annually, making VC a "return-free risk" for most limited partners.

Navan's IPO stumbled despite decent growth and improving margins, not because of its own fundamentals, but due to its relative unattractiveness. In the current market, public investors prefer putting capital into proven, profitable tech giants with strong AI stories over an unprofitable company at a high sales multiple.

Companies like SpaceX and OpenAI command massive private valuations partly because access to their shares is scarce. An IPO removes this barrier, making the stock universally available. This loss of scarcity value can lead to a valuation decline, a pattern seen in other assets like crypto when they became easily accessible via ETFs.