Implementing AI tools in a company that lacks a clear product strategy and deep customer knowledge doesn't speed up successful development; it only accelerates aimless activity. True acceleration comes from applying AI to a well-defined direction informed by user understanding.
Related Insights
Before launch, product leaders must ask if their AI offering is a true product or just a feature. Slapping an AI label on a tool that automates a minor part of a larger workflow is a gimmick. It will fail unless it solves a core, high-friction problem for the customer in its entirety.
Don't evaluate your team's AI readiness as a standalone capability. True AI strategy requires a deep understanding of customer problems and unique value. Without strong core product competencies, AI adoption is merely tactical, not strategic.
Product managers should leverage AI to get 80% of the way on tasks like competitive analysis, but must apply their own intellect for the final 20%. Fully abdicating responsibility to AI can lead to factual errors and hallucinations that, if used to build a product, result in costly rework and strategic missteps.
Without a strong foundation in customer problem definition, AI tools simply accelerate bad practices. Teams that habitually jump to solutions without a clear "why" will find themselves building rudderless products at an even faster pace. AI makes foundational product discipline more critical, not less.
The ease of AI development tools tempts founders to build products immediately. A more effective approach is to first use AI for deep market research and GTM strategy validation. This prevents wasting time building a product that nobody wants.
The temptation to use AI to rapidly generate, prioritize, and document features without deep customer validation poses a significant risk. This can scale the "feature factory" problem, allowing teams to build the wrong things faster than ever, making human judgment and product thinking paramount.
In the rush to adopt AI, teams are tempted to start with the technology and search for a problem. However, the most successful AI products still adhere to the fundamental principle of starting with user pain points, not the capabilities of the technology.
Teams that become over-reliant on generative AI as a silver bullet are destined to fail. True success comes from teams that remain "maniacally focused" on user and business value, using AI with intent to serve that purpose, not as the purpose itself.
Companies racing to add AI features while ignoring core product principles—like solving a real problem for a defined market—are creating a wave of failed products, dubbed "AI slop" by product coach Teresa Torres.
As AI automates synthesis and creation, the product manager's core value shifts from managing the development process to deeply contextualizing all available information (market, customer, strategy) to define the *right* product direction.