Companies racing to add AI features while ignoring core product principles—like solving a real problem for a defined market—are creating a wave of failed products, dubbed "AI slop" by product coach Teresa Torres.
Related Insights
Don't view AI as just a feature set. Instead, treat "intelligence" as a fundamental new building block for software, on par with established primitives like databases or APIs. When conceptualizing any new product, assume this intelligence layer is a non-negotiable part of the technology stack to solve user problems effectively.
Don't feel pressured to label every AI-powered enhancement as an "AI feature." For example, using AI to generate CSS for a new dark mode is simply a better way to build. The focus should be on the user benefit (dark mode), not the underlying technology, making AI an invisible, powerful tool.
Many teams wrongly focus on the latest models and frameworks. True improvement comes from classic product development: talking to users, preparing better data, optimizing workflows, and writing better prompts.
For AI products, the quality of the model's response is paramount. Before building a full feature (MVP), first validate that you can achieve a 'Minimum Viable Output' (MVO). If the core AI output isn't reliable and desirable, don't waste time productizing the feature around it.
Product managers should leverage AI to get 80% of the way on tasks like competitive analysis, but must apply their own intellect for the final 20%. Fully abdicating responsibility to AI can lead to factual errors and hallucinations that, if used to build a product, result in costly rework and strategic missteps.
Instead of waiting for AI models to be perfect, design your application from the start to allow for human correction. This pragmatic approach acknowledges AI's inherent uncertainty and allows you to deliver value sooner by leveraging human oversight to handle edge cases.
Successful AI products follow a three-stage evolution. Version 1.0 attracts 'AI tourists' who play with the tool. Version 2.0 serves early adopters who provide crucial feedback. Only version 3.0 is ready to target the mass market, which hates change and requires a truly polished, valuable product.
Research highlights "work slop": AI output that appears polished but lacks human context. This forces coworkers to spend significant time fixing it, effectively offloading cognitive labor and damaging perceptions of the sender's capability and trustworthiness.
Despite AI tools making it easier than ever to design, code, and launch applications, many people feel stuck and don't know what to build. This suggests a deficit in big-picture thinking and problem identification, not a lack of technical capability.
The era of winning with merely functional software is over. As technology, especially AI, makes baseline functionality easier to build, the key differentiator becomes design excellence and superior craft. Mediocre, 'good enough' products will lose to those that are exceptionally well-designed.
