Don't evaluate your team's AI readiness as a standalone capability. True AI strategy requires a deep understanding of customer problems and unique value. Without strong core product competencies, AI adoption is merely tactical, not strategic.
Don't view AI as just a feature set. Instead, treat "intelligence" as a fundamental new building block for software, on par with established primitives like databases or APIs. When conceptualizing any new product, assume this intelligence layer is a non-negotiable part of the technology stack to solve user problems effectively.
Many teams wrongly focus on the latest models and frameworks. True improvement comes from classic product development: talking to users, preparing better data, optimizing workflows, and writing better prompts.
Product managers should leverage AI to get 80% of the way on tasks like competitive analysis, but must apply their own intellect for the final 20%. Fully abdicating responsibility to AI can lead to factual errors and hallucinations that, if used to build a product, result in costly rework and strategic missteps.
Don't just sprinkle AI features onto your existing product ('AI at the edge'). Transformative companies rethink workflows and shrink their old codebase, making the LLM a core part of the solution. This is about re-architecting the solution from the ground up, not just enhancing it.
To be truly successful, a product leader cannot just focus on features and users. They must operate as the head of their product's business, with a deep understanding of P&Ls, revenue drivers, and capital allocation. Without this business acumen, they risk fundamentally undercutting their product's potential impact and success.
Treat AI initiatives as two separate strategic pillars. Create one roadmap focused on internal efficiency gains and cost reduction (productivity). Maintain a separate roadmap for developing new, revenue-generating customer experiences (growth). This prevents conflating internal tools with external products.
Enterprises struggle to get value from AI due to a lack of iterative, data-science expertise. The winning model for AI companies isn't just selling APIs, but embedding "forward deployment" teams of engineers and scientists to co-create solutions, closing the gap between prototype and production value.
The true enterprise value of AI lies not in consuming third-party models, but in building internal capabilities to diffuse intelligence throughout the organization. This means creating proprietary "AI factories" rather than just using external tools and admiring others' success.
The key technical skill for an AI PM is not deep knowledge of model architecture but a higher-level understanding of how to orchestrate AI components. Knowing what AI can do and how systems connect is more valuable than knowing the specifics of fine-tuning or RAG implementation.
Technical implementation is becoming easier with AI. The critical, and now more valuable, skill is the ability to deeply understand customer needs, communicate effectively, and guide a product to market fit. The focus is shifting from "how to build it" to "what to build and why."