The common "brand vs. demand" debate is flawed. Panelists argue that consistent, long-term brand building (creating "brand gravity") is not something to balance with short-term pipeline goals, but rather the foundational investment that makes demand capture easier and more predictable.

Related Insights

While investing in brand is crucial for long-term growth, it cannot come at the expense of hitting immediate pipeline and revenue targets. A key CMO competency is to treat these numbers as non-negotiable while effectively negotiating with partners like sales to secure and protect a dedicated budget for awareness activities.

Before scaling paid acquisition, invest in a robust brand system. A well-defined brand DNA (art direction, voice, tone) is not a vanity project; it's the necessary infrastructure to efficiently generate the thousands of cohesive creative assets required to test and scale performance marketing campaigns successfully.

Instead of siloing brand and demand, view them as a unified function on a spectrum. The only difference is the scale of the audience, from mass market (brand) to a targeted market (demand). This reframes the relationship and encourages integrated thinking rather than creating separate camps.

Stop viewing brand as a top-of-funnel activity. For elite companies, brand isn't a precursor to selling; it is the selling. It creates inbound demand that bypasses traditional conversion tactics like search ads or affiliate marketing, making it the most powerful and sustainable growth engine.

Data shows that adding brand marketing to a performance-driven engine can increase median ROI by 90%. The persistent tension between brand and performance stems from short-termism and the allure of easily measured clicks, creating a false dichotomy between two essential functions.

The "build it and they will come" mindset is a trap. Founders should treat marketing and brand-building not as a later-stage activity to be "turned on," but as a core muscle to be developed in parallel with the product from day one.

Think of consistent brand building—through thought leadership and storytelling—as preparing the soil. It lays a foundation of trust and recognition. When a targeted ABX campaign is launched, it lands with a warmer, more receptive audience, rather than feeling like a cold, disjointed outreach.

The conflict between brand building and demand generation is unproductive. The most effective approach treats them as a single, integrated outreach strategy. This ensures consistent, relevant messaging that builds trust over the long term, preventing user drop-off from disjointed experiences.

Effective demand generation is a barbell, requiring strong top-of-funnel brand investment to create awareness and great bottom-of-funnel product marketing to convert interest. Viewing performance marketing as a standalone function and funding it in isolation is like "throwing money at a problem but not solving it."

Position marketing as the engine for future quarters' growth, while sales focuses on closing current-quarter deals. This reframes marketing's long-term investments (like brand building) as essential for sustainable revenue, justifying budgets that don't show immediate, direct ROI to a CFO.