Author Lionel Shriver prefers writing in "Third-Person Limited" (seeing the world through one character's eyes) because it replicates the human condition. We are trapped in our own heads and must interpret others based on external evidence, making this narrative style deeply realistic.
Related Insights
Instead of inventing ideas, 'snatch' them from real-life observations. The power lies in using concrete, specific details from these moments—like an overheard conversation. This makes content more original, relatable, and emotionally compelling than generic advice, fostering a deeper audience connection.
Austen pioneered the 'free indirect style,' where the third-person narrative adopts a character's thoughts, feelings, and—crucially—their delusions. This forces the reader to actively distinguish a character's biased perspective from reality, a technique used powerfully to show internal conflict in novels like 'Persuasion' and 'Emma.'
According to Lionel Shriver, a novelist's task is not to reinforce beliefs but to plant a seed of doubt. By presenting a compelling alternative reality, fiction can contaminate a reader's innocent assumptions and force them to contend with complexity, splitting their perspective.
The modal verb "must" is a key tell in Austen's writing. When a character's internal monologue insists something "must" be true, it often reveals they are trying to force a belief upon themselves against their true feelings. This simple word exposes a deep psychological struggle and internal conflict.
Despite her reputation for conservative subject matter, Austen's technical audacity was unprecedented. She introduced narrative techniques like free indirect style to English fiction, making her a true experimental writer of her time, developing these innovations in isolation without a literary community for feedback.
A coherent picture of a person is built from heterogeneous, often contradictory, elements. Readers find this more convincing because it mirrors real life; everyone we know is contradictory. Instead of forcing a simple narrative, revealing inconsistencies makes a character feel more authentic and human.
Unlike watching a movie as an observer, reading makes you embody the character, lighting up the brain as if you're living their experiences. This unique power to generate deep empathy is why books face such intense banning efforts from those who want to control who children empathize with.
When presented with direct facts, our brains use effortful reasoning, which is prone to defensive reactions. Stories transport us, engaging different, more social brain systems. This allows us to analyze a situation objectively, as if observing others, making us more receptive to the underlying message.
The "features vs. benefits" debate is a false dichotomy. Great messaging, like fiction writing, uses "narrative distance" to strategically zoom in on details (features) and zoom out to the big picture (outcomes). This creates a complete story and avoids getting stuck at one extreme.
To write authentically for someone else, you must go beyond mimicking their language and stylistic quirks. The key is to understand their fundamental worldview—how they see the world and their core beliefs. This deeper understanding is what prevents the writing from feeling inauthentic.
