Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Lip-Bu Tan states that 90% of his portfolio companies change their business plan mid-journey due to market shifts. Because of this inevitability, he prioritizes investing in adaptable, open-minded entrepreneurial *teams* rather than lone visionaries, as a cohesive group is better equipped to navigate pivots.

Related Insights

Extensive diligence on a seed-stage company's market or product is often wasted effort. The majority of successful seed investments pivot to a completely different business model, making the founding team's quality and resilience the most crucial factor to evaluate.

Investors often prefer that a founder who loses conviction in their initial idea pivot and use the remaining capital on a new approach, rather than shutting down. Returning a fraction of the investment is a worse outcome than betting on the founder's talent to find a new path in a large market. The money is a sunk cost; the founder is not.

The founder's number one piece of advice is to get the co-founder relationship right. While you can pivot ideas, raise more funding, or change markets, replacing a co-founder is incredibly difficult. A strong, complementary founding team is the foundation for overcoming all other startup challenges.

In dynamic markets like AI, where technology and business models evolve rapidly, the founding team's quality ('the jockey') becomes more critical than the initial business plan ('the horse'). The ability of a small, talented team to pivot and execute on new opportunities is the key determinant of success.

While speed is a key business strategy, it's insufficient in a market where the technological foundation shifts weekly. The priority for AI startups should be building high talent density. This enables the company to change direction correctly and quickly, avoiding the trap of moving fast towards an obsolete goal.

In early-stage investing, the quality of the founder can be more important than the initial business concept. A strong founder is seen as someone who will eventually find success, even if the first idea requires a pivot.

Lonsdale recounts passing on brilliant founders with seemingly terrible ideas, only to watch them pivot and build billion-dollar companies like Cursor. The lesson for early-stage investors is to prioritize backing exceptional, world-class talent, even if their initial concept seems flawed, as they possess the ability to find a winning strategy.

The most successful founders rarely get the solution right on their first attempt. Their strength lies in persistence combined with adaptability. They treat their initial ideas as hypotheses, take in new data, and are willing to change their approach repeatedly to find what works.

Successful people with unconventional paths ('dark horses') avoid rigid five or ten-year plans. Like early-stage founders, they focus on making the best immediate choice that aligns with their fulfillment, maintaining the agility to pivot. This iterative approach consistently outperforms fixed, long-term roadmaps.

Hired managers optimize existing models, but founders are willing to reinvent the business entirely. During disruptive eras, like the current AI shift, founders are more likely to make the bold, necessary pivots to survive and thrive, while professional CEOs will be too conservative.

90% of Startups Pivot, Which Is Why Intel's CEO Backs Teams, Not Solo Founders | RiffOn