Salaried, remote professionals can often self-accommodate. The disability employment crisis is concentrated among lower-wage workers whose jobs require physical presence and are subject to more rigid management, as 90% of accommodation requests come from the lower half of the pay scale.
Related Insights
Leaving accommodation decisions to individual managers introduces personal bias, fear, and legal ignorance, creating massive risk. The solution is a standardized process where managers immediately escalate any disability-related issue to a trained, centralized HR team.
Non-disabled employees closely observe how their company handles disability accommodations. Fair and supportive processes create psychological safety for the entire workforce, boosting retention as employees see a potential safety net for their own future needs.
Fields like nursing, teaching, and home health care have chronically low wages because they are culturally derived from 'women's work' historically done for free in the home. This legacy creates an implicit expectation that care, not compensation, should be the primary motivation, thus suppressing wages.
The minimum wage effectively makes it illegal for an employer to hire a worker whose skills are not yet worth the mandated hourly rate. This prevents young or unskilled individuals from accepting lower-paying jobs that would provide crucial skills and experience, trapping them in a cycle of unemployability.
Contrary to popular belief, Gensler's research and internal experience show that younger employees are the most eager to return to the office. They recognize that in-person work is critical for learning, mentorship, and building the "social capital" necessary for long-term career growth.
A common misconception is that accommodating employees means accepting lower output. The correct approach is to maintain the same performance, attendance, and safety standards for everyone, but to provide different tools and methods—the accommodations—to help employees meet those standards.
Companies that for years claimed remote work or flexible schedules were unreasonable for disabled employees instantly implemented those exact policies for everyone during the pandemic. This exposed that the barriers were never about feasibility but about corporate willingness and systemic ableism.
This popular DEI phrase is a "fair-weather" inclusion policy that ignores structural inequities. It asks marginalized workers to be vulnerable in environments that are often unsafe, shifting the burden of "authenticity" onto those most at risk of being harmed by it.
Most AI applications are designed to make white-collar work more productive or redundant (e.g., data collation). However, the most pressing labor shortages in advanced economies like the U.S. are in blue-collar fields like welding and electrical work, where current AI has little impact and is not being focused.
Companies wrongly assume accommodating disabilities is expensive, but most solutions cost under $300. The true financial drain comes from legal fees, consultant costs, and lost productivity resulting from managers making biased, fear-based decisions instead of seeking simple solutions.