The minimum wage effectively makes it illegal for an employer to hire a worker whose skills are not yet worth the mandated hourly rate. This prevents young or unskilled individuals from accepting lower-paying jobs that would provide crucial skills and experience, trapping them in a cycle of unemployability.
Related Insights
Forcing businesses to pay a mandated high wage for a low-value job creates a powerful incentive to automate that role, especially with the rise of AI. A better approach is bottom-up regulation that fosters a competitive labor market, forcing companies to increase wages naturally to attract talent.
When full-time employees at large corporations still qualify for government aid like SNAP, taxpayers are effectively subsidizing the company's payroll. This allows the private entity to maintain higher profits by paying wages that are too low to live on, with the government covering the gap.
The unemployment rate for college-educated young men has surged to 7%, matching that of their peers without a degree. This parity indicates that a traditional degree's value in securing entry-level employment is eroding for this demographic, challenged by AI automation and increased competition from experienced workers.
The difficulty in hiring young talent is not a temporary trend but a "new ice age." It is driven by a smaller Gen Z population compared to millennials. The problem will worsen: within a decade, more people over 65 will be leaving careers than 16-year-olds are starting them, creating a long-term demographic crisis for employers.
Policies like price caps (e.g., for insulin) or price floors (e.g., minimum wage) that deviate from market equilibrium create distortions. The economy then compensates in unintended ways, such as companies ceasing production of price-capped goods or moving to under-the-table employment to avoid high minimum wages.
Well-intentioned government support programs can become an economic "shackle," disincentivizing upward mobility. This risks a negative cycle: dependent citizens demand more benefits, requiring higher taxes that drive out businesses, which erodes the tax base and leads to calls for even more wealth redistribution and government control.
America intentionally avoided solving illegal immigration because it serves a crucial economic purpose: providing a flexible, cheap labor force that doesn't draw on social safety nets. This benefits industries and consumers while placing little burden on the state.
A bipartisan legislative effort is being driven by stark warnings that AI will eliminate entry-level roles. Senator Mark Warner predicts unemployment for recent college graduates could surge from 9% to 25% "very shortly," highlighting the immediate economic threat to the youngest workforce segment.
Most AI applications are designed to make white-collar work more productive or redundant (e.g., data collation). However, the most pressing labor shortages in advanced economies like the U.S. are in blue-collar fields like welding and electrical work, where current AI has little impact and is not being focused.
By shipping millions of jobs overseas, globalism forced American workers to compete with a much larger, cheaper international labor pool. This eliminated employers' need to compete for a finite domestic workforce, leading to wage stagnation. The proposed solution is to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S.