Avoid implementation paralysis by focusing on the majority of use cases rather than rare edge cases. The fear that an automated system might mishandle a single unique request shouldn't prevent you from launching tools that will benefit 99% of your customer interactions and drive significant efficiency.

There's often a massive gap between a company's strategic goals and where development teams actually spend time. In one case, only 2% of capacity was spent on the top strategic goal because teams are "magnets for requests" that derail progress on the big picture.

Customers request specific features (supply), but this masks the true demand—the underlying problem they're trying to solve. Focusing on the 'why' behind the request leads to simpler, more effective solutions, like building a digest email instead of a complex 'advanced settings' page.

When a product team is busy but their impact is minimal or hard to quantify, the root cause is often not poor execution but a lack of clarity in the overarching company strategy. Fixing the high-level strategy provides the focus necessary for product work to create meaningful value.

Avoid the trap of building features for a single customer, which grinds products to a halt. When a high-stakes customer makes a specific request, the goal is to reframe and build it in a way that benefits the entire customer base, turning a one-off demand into a strategic win-win.

Saying yes to numerous individual client features creates a 'complexity tax'. This hidden cost manifests as a bloated codebase, increased bugs, and high maintenance overhead, consuming engineering capacity and crippling the ability to innovate on the core product.

Many businesses avoid adopting new tools like online scheduling because they fixate on potential outlier problems (e.g., a complex booking). This "paralysis by analysis" over imaginary scenarios prevents them from capturing the majority of leads who would benefit from convenience, ultimately costing them business.

Many B2B companies begin by customizing software for one client, then stacking new custom projects for subsequent clients. They believe they are building a product, but are actually creating a complex, unscalable monolith that is difficult to maintain and evolve.

For a small team, solving customer problems reactively is a trap. It drains irreplaceable time and energy, often in service of non-ideal customers, which unintentionally creates more systemic issues. A proactive, ICP-driven approach is the only sustainable path when you lack the resources to constantly fight fires.