Despite recession-level downward revisions in job data, the economy avoided a downturn. The proposed reason is a rare simultaneous shock: labor demand fell due to tariffs and a slowing economy, while labor supply also contracted significantly due to immigration reform. This kept the unemployment rate stable, preventing a recessionary spiral.
Related Insights
A significant stagnation in job growth since May coincides with both new tariff implementations (reducing labor demand) and stricter immigration policies (constraining labor supply). This combination has created a powerful dual shock that has effectively halted job creation in the US economy.
A shrinking labor force, driven by retiring Baby Boomers and restrictive immigration policies, could offset job losses caused by AI. This dynamic means the official unemployment rate might remain stable even if total employment declines, creating a misleading picture of labor market health.
Instead of simple "weak" or "strong" labels, the current labor market is better characterized by intensifying disruption. This stems from simultaneous shocks on the supply side (immigration) and the demand side (technology), creating profound uncertainty for households.
Companies are avoiding layoffs but have exhausted all other cost-cutting measures: slowing hiring to near-zero, cutting hours, and reducing temp staff. This "firewall" against recession is the only thing holding up the labor market, but it leaves businesses with no other levers to pull if demand weakens further.
The combination of solid GDP growth and weaker job creation is not necessarily a warning sign, but a structural shift. With productivity growth rebounding to its 2% historical average and labor supply constrained by lower immigration, the economy can grow robustly without adding as many jobs as in the past.
An analysis of ADP payroll data shows job growth is concentrated entirely in large companies (over 250 employees), while smaller firms are consistently shedding jobs. This divergence is attributed to smaller businesses' inability to absorb tariff costs or reshuffle supply chains, unlike their larger, more resilient counterparts.
Apparent softening in the labor market, like rising African-American unemployment, isn't a cyclical downturn. Instead, it reflects idiosyncratic shocks, such as government spending reallocation and post-COVID hiring overhangs, masking underlying strong demand.
Mastercard's Chief Economist argues the labor market is in balance, not collapsing. A slowdown from 175k to ~70k jobs/month is a necessary correction from an unsustainable, post-pandemic surge. With both labor demand (hiring) and supply decreasing, key metrics like the unemployment rate remain stable, indicating equilibrium rather than decline.
The US labor market is stuck in a 'low hire, low fire' mode, preventing a more robust recovery. This stagnation is not from a lack of demand but is directly attributed to the combined effects of restrictive immigration controls and the lingering impact of tariffs, which suppress hiring activity and consumer purchasing power.
Analysis shows a direct correlation between the April 4th tariff announcements and the subsequent halt in net job creation. For months, job growth has hovered near zero, suggesting the trade policy shift had an immediate, negative impact on the labor market.