Instead of simple "weak" or "strong" labels, the current labor market is better characterized by intensifying disruption. This stems from simultaneous shocks on the supply side (immigration) and the demand side (technology), creating profound uncertainty for households.
Related Insights
The primary threat to the labor market isn't just layoffs, but a decline in overall dynamism. A confluence of factors—retiring boomers, fewer foreign-born workers, and lower foreign student enrollment—is creating skills gaps and making it harder for employers to find qualified talent, which may accelerate the replacement of labor with capital.
A significant stagnation in job growth since May coincides with both new tariff implementations (reducing labor demand) and stricter immigration policies (constraining labor supply). This combination has created a powerful dual shock that has effectively halted job creation in the US economy.
A shrinking labor force, driven by retiring Baby Boomers and restrictive immigration policies, could offset job losses caused by AI. This dynamic means the official unemployment rate might remain stable even if total employment declines, creating a misleading picture of labor market health.
The current labor market is in a state of paralysis, described as a "deer in the headlights" moment. Businesses, facing extreme uncertainty from tariffs and policy shifts, have frozen both hiring and layoffs. This creates a stagnant, low-dynamism environment where both employers and employees are cautiously waiting.
The US labor market is stuck in a 'low hire, low fire' mode, preventing a more robust recovery. This stagnation is not from a lack of demand but is directly attributed to the combined effects of restrictive immigration controls and the lingering impact of tariffs, which suppress hiring activity and consumer purchasing power.
AI is a key factor in the current labor market stagnation. Companies are reluctant to hire as they assess AI's long-term impact on staffing needs. At the same time, they are holding onto experienced employees who are crucial for implementing and integrating the new AI technologies, thus suppressing layoffs.
Companies are preemptively slowing hiring for roles they anticipate AI will automate within two years. This "quiet hiring freeze" avoids the cost of hiring, training, and then laying off staff. It is a subtle but powerful leading indicator of labor market disruption, happening long before official unemployment figures reflect the shift.
The labor market faces a dual threat. Weak demand, linked to tariffs and deglobalization, has already pushed job growth to zero. As AI adoption accelerates productivity, it could further suppress labor demand, potentially tipping the economy into a state of net job decline.
AI is exacerbating labor inequality. While the top 1% of highly-skilled workers have more opportunity than ever, the other 99% face a grim reality of competing against both elite talent and increasingly capable AI, leading to career instability.
Job seekers use AI to generate resumes en masse, forcing employers to use AI filters to manage the volume. This creates a vicious cycle where more AI is needed to beat the filters, resulting in a "low-hire, low-fire" equilibrium. While activity seems high, actual hiring has stalled, masking a significant economic disruption.
