Constantly shielding your team from discomfort to optimize for short-term happiness ultimately builds anxiety and fragility. True resilience comes from a culture where people can face hard things, supported by leadership, and learn to cope with disappointment.
Top founders don't simply "tough it out" or present a stoic front. They actively manage the immense stress of their role through practices like therapy and setting boundaries. Suppressing emotions leads to burnout, whereas processing them leads to resilience and better decision-making for the entire team.
Organizational success depends less on high-profile 'superstars' and more on 'Sherpas'—generous, energetic team players who handle the essential, often invisible, support work. When hiring, actively screen for generosity and positive energy, as these are the people who enable collective achievement.
Resilience isn't about avoiding failure but about developing the ability to recover from it swiftly. Experiencing public failure and learning to move on builds a crucial 'muscle' for rebounding. This capacity to bounce back from a loss is more critical for long-term success than maintaining a perfect record.
While consistency is valuable, emotional stability is more critical for leadership, especially in turbulent times. A leader with a stable, predictable temperament provides psychological safety and prevents team-wide panic. This mental health-centric view of leadership fosters a more resilient and trusting environment than simply being consistent with actions.
A common misconception is that psychological safety means being comfortable and polite. In reality, it's the capacity to have necessary, difficult conversations—challenging ideas or giving honest feedback—that allows a team to flourish. A culture that feels too polite is likely not psychologically safe.
Musician Jacob Collier evaluates groups on a 'supple vs. brittle' axis. Supple groups adapt to unexpected events, while brittle ones resist and snap under pressure. Leaders must create psychological safety that enables teams to embrace spontaneity rather than tightening up.
Before labeling a team as not resilient, leaders should first examine their own expectations. Often, what appears as a lack of resilience is a natural reaction to systemic issues like overwork, underpayment, and inadequate support, making it a leadership problem, not an employee one.
Resilience isn't a switch to be flipped during a crisis. It is the accumulated result of consistent habits, a supportive culture, and a psychological "margin" built over time. It is an outcome of intentional preparation, not an inherent trait you simply possess.
To foster an innovative team that takes big swings, leaders must create a culture of psychological safety. Team members must know they won't be fired for a failed experiment. Instead, failures should be treated as learning opportunities, encouraging them to be edgier and push boundaries.
A strong culture isn't defined by perks during good times; it's proven by how the team operates during crises. Companies that face significant struggles early in their journey often develop a more resilient and authentic culture, which becomes a crucial asset for long-term survival and success.