Ed Luttwak provocatively argues that Europe's historical energy, innovation, and even population growth were fueled by constant, intense warfare between its states. By achieving peace after 1945, Europe "removed the engine of the car," leading to demographic decline and a loss of dynamism, with the most pacifist nations suffering the most.
Related Insights
Unlike China's vast, easily unified plains, Europe's geography of mountains and rivers created natural barriers. This prevented a single empire from dominating and instead fostered centuries of intense competition between states. This constant conflict spurred rapid technological and military innovation, ultimately leading to European dominance.
Historically, Russia and China's strategy as continental empires involves avoiding two-front wars and actively destabilizing neighboring states. This creates buffer zones and prevents any single power from becoming a threat on their borders, ensuring their own security through regional instability.
For generations, Western societies have viewed peace and prosperity as the default state. This perception is a historical outlier, making the return to 'dog eat dog' great power politics seem shocking, when in fact it's a reversion to the historical norm of conflict.
The losers of WWII, Germany and Japan, paradoxically "won the peace." Their complete devastation forced a societal and industrial reset, funded by the US. This allowed hyper-modernization and rapid economic growth, while victorious but bankrupt Britain was stuck with aging infrastructure and financial burdens.
External shocks like wars or plagues don't destroy golden ages directly. The real danger is the subsequent societal shift from an open, exploratory "Athenian" outlook to a closed, protectionist "Spartan" one. This fear-based mentality stifles the innovation required for regeneration, leading to decline.
Ed Luttwak identifies a recurring historical pattern of self-sabotage. Imperial Germany challenged the British Royal Navy, which protected its global commerce. Today, China challenges the US Navy, which secures the sea lanes vital for Chinese trade. This is a recurring strategic error driven by a misplaced desire for military parity.
When a country is successful for too long, its citizens forget the difficult and often violent actions required to achieve that prosperity. This ignorance leads to guilt, a weakened national identity, and an inability to make tough decisions for self-preservation.
Civilizations don't fall directly from war or plague. They fall when these shocks trigger a psychological shift from an open, exploratory mindset to a fearful, protectionist one. This 'Spartan mentality' stifles the innovation required to overcome the original challenges, leading to decline.
The period from 1870-1914 mirrors today's super cycle of innovation, wealth concentration, inequality, populism, nationalism, and geopolitical rivalry. This makes it a more relevant historical parallel for understanding current risks than the recent era of hyper-globalization.
Ed Luttwak argues that his hometown was one of the only Jewish communities in Europe to grow during WWII due to strategic leadership. He contends this successful resistance, where leaders acted like a "nation under attack," is a narrative largely ignored by Holocaust historians who focus on stories of victimhood.