The conflict in Ukraine exposed the vulnerability of expensive, "exquisite" military platforms (like tanks) to inexpensive technologies (like drones). This has shifted defense priorities toward cheap, mass-producible, "attritable" systems. This fundamental change in product and economics creates a massive opportunity for startups to innovate outside the traditional defense prime model.

From China's perspective, producing more than it needs and exporting at cutthroat prices is a strategic tool, not an economic problem. This form of industrial warfare is designed to weaken other nations' manufacturing bases, prioritizing geopolitical goals over profit.

The defining political and cultural conflict of modern Britain is the ideological battle between Clement Attlee and Margaret Thatcher. Attlee established the post-war socialist consensus (NHS, welfare state), while Thatcher introduced radical individualism and free-market capitalism, creating a lasting tension that shapes the nation today.

German automaker Volkswagen can now develop and build an electric vehicle in China for half the cost of doing so elsewhere. This shift from simple manufacturing to localized R&D—the "innovate in China for the world" model—signifies a dangerous hollowing out of core industrial capabilities and high-value jobs in Western economies.

For years, Japan was a value trap: cheap companies with poor governance hoarded cash. The game changed when Prime Minister Shinzo Abe introduced stewardship and governance codes, creating a top-down, government-backed catalyst for companies to finally improve capital allocation and unlock shareholder value.

Investors fixate on Japan's high sovereign debt. However, Wagner points out that the central bank owns a large portion. More importantly, the corporate and household sectors are net cash positive, making the overall economy far less levered than the single headline number suggests.

After WWII, the U.S. used its naval dominance to guarantee global trade. In exchange for writing its allies' security policies, it allowed open access to its market. This economic "unfairness" was the strategic cost of building a global coalition against the Soviet Union, effectively bribing nations into an alliance.

According to IMF data analysis, China's manufacturing surplus as a share of its GDP has surpassed 2%, exceeding the levels of Japan and Germany during their most dominant export eras. This indicates China is achieving global manufacturing dominance at a scale and speed that is historically unprecedented, fundamentally altering global trade dynamics.

A historical indicator of a superpower's decline is when its spending on debt servicing surpasses its military budget. The US crossed this threshold a few years ago, while China is massively increasing military spending. This economic framework offers a stark, quantitative lens through which to view the long-term power shift between the two nations.