No language is 'perfect' because its evolution is a trade-off. Speakers tend toward efficiency and simplification (slurring), while hearers require clarity and precision. This constant tug-of-war drives linguistic change, explaining why languages are always in flux.
Related Insights
While geological and biological evolution are slow, cultural evolution—the transmission and updating of knowledge—is incredibly fast. Humans' success stems from shifting to this faster clock. AI and LLMs are tools that dramatically accelerate this process, acting as a force multiplier for cultural evolution.
Explaining a creative process is inherently a "lossy compression" of the real thing; key nuances are lost in translation. This is why even detailed explanations of a successful process can't be perfectly replicated. The audience then "uncompresses" this partial data into their own interpretation.
With non-native speakers as the majority of English users, the language constantly evolves in diverse ways globally. Efforts to impose a simplified, standard version for business (like "globish") are unlikely to succeed because language is a living system that speakers inherently and creatively adapt, making it impossible to control.
Analysis of models' hidden 'chain of thought' reveals the emergence of a unique internal dialect. This language is compressed, uses non-standard grammar, and contains bizarre phrases that are already difficult for humans to interpret, complicating safety monitoring and raising concerns about future incomprehensibility.
Linguist Anne Kerzan reframes jargon not as a flaw, but as a specialized lexicon for a profession. It provides useful shortcuts and creates a sense of shared identity for insiders. The negative perception arises from being an outsider or when jargon is used to obscure meaning, such as with corporate euphemisms.
Contrary to being a 'lesser' language, slang is arguably richer than standard vocabulary. A standard word often has only a specific referential meaning, whereas a slang term simultaneously communicates the speaker's identity (e.g., Gen Z), their attitude (contempt, affection), and their desired self-perception.
Focusing solely on making communication faster or shorter is a mistake. Communication ultimately fails if the recipient doesn't interpret the message as the sender intended. The true goal is creating shared understanding, which accounts for the recipient's personal context and perspective, not just transmitting data efficiently.
Bad writing often happens because experts find it impossible to imagine what it's like *not* to know something. This "curse" leads them to assume their private knowledge is common knowledge, causing them to omit jargon explanations, abbreviations, and concrete examples. The key to clarity is empathy for the reader's perspective.
The idea of 'perfect' communication is a myth. Everyday talk is messy, and what one person considers 'good' communication, another may not. Acknowledging this subjectivity frees you to connect more authentically instead of striving for an impossible, universal standard of being 'just right.'
We often assume our message is received as intended, but this is a frequent point of failure in communication. The only thing that matters is what the listener understands. To ensure clarity and avoid conflict, proactively ask the other person to reflect back what they heard you say.
