The sharp drop in the fiscal impulse represents a direct, dollar-for-dollar hit to nominal GDP that has already occurred. This indicates a recession is underway, not forthcoming. The National Bureau of Economic Analysis (NBER) will likely backdate the start of this recession to the third quarter of 2025.

The combination of solid GDP growth and weaker job creation is not necessarily a warning sign, but a structural shift. With productivity growth rebounding to its 2% historical average and labor supply constrained by lower immigration, the economy can grow robustly without adding as many jobs as in the past.

Despite a still-growing labor market, real wage growth has slowed to "stall speed." This lagged effect on middle and lower-income households is the primary driver for the projected 2-percentage-point drop in real consumption growth for Q4 and Q1.

Morgan Stanley identifies a rare divergence between strong U.S. spending data and very weak employment figures. How this tension resolves will determine the global economy's path in 2026, creating either a mild recession or a spending-driven boom. Other major economies like Europe and China are not expected to be sources of major surprises.

Headline GDP figures can be misleading in an environment of high immigration and inflation. Metrics like per-capita energy consumption or the number of labor hours needed to afford goods provide a more accurate picture of individual well-being, revealing that many feel poorer despite positive official growth numbers.

Restricting immigration halts a key source of labor for essential sectors like agriculture and construction. This drives up consumer costs and could cut GDP by 4-7%, creating a direct path to higher inflation and slower economic growth.

Including government employment in GDP calculations is a form of double-counting tax revenue that masks the true health of the private sector. A major reduction in federal workers would reveal a startlingly low real growth rate, exposing decades of underlying economic stagnation.

Robert Kaplan suggests the labor market's sluggishness might not be a simple cyclical slowdown. He points to a significant "matching problem" where open jobs don't align with the skills of job seekers. This structural issue limits the effectiveness of monetary policy as a solution.

Tariffs are creating a stagflationary effect on the economy. This is visible in PMI data, which shows muted business activity while the "prices paid" component remains high. This combination of slowing growth and rising costs acts as a significant "speed break" on the economy without stopping it entirely.