The decision to delay a product to fix a design flaw was easier because the team had recently killed another product that failed due to a weak value proposition. This painful, shared experience created organizational readiness to prioritize getting the product right over hitting an arbitrary deadline.
Related Insights
During product discovery, Amazon teams ask, "What would be our worst possible news headline?" This pre-mortem practice forces the team to identify and confront potential weak points, blind spots, and negative outcomes upfront. It's a powerful tool for looking around corners and ensuring all bases are covered before committing to build.
The conventional wisdom that you must sacrifice one of quality, price, or speed is flawed. High-performance teams reject this trade-off, understanding that improving quality is the primary lever. Higher quality reduces rework and defects, which naturally leads to lower long-term costs and faster delivery, creating a virtuous cycle.
Unlike software, hardware iteration is slow and costly. A better approach is to resist building immediately and instead spend the majority of time on deep problem discovery. This allows you to "one-shot" a much better first version, minimizing wasted cycles on flawed prototypes.
To balance immediate user needs with long-term R&D, Eleven Labs uses a "3-month rule." If a foundational research solution is projected to take more than three months, the product team is empowered to ship a simpler, faster, tactical solution in the interim.
A founder's retrospective analysis often reveals that delayed decisions were the correct ones, and the only regret is not acting sooner. Recognizing this pattern—that you rarely regret moving too fast—can serve as a powerful heuristic to trust your gut and accelerate decision-making, as inaction is often the biggest risk.
Many founders become too attached to what they've built. The ability to unemotionally kill products that aren't working—even core parts of the business—is a superpower. This prevents wasting resources and allows for the rapid pivots necessary to find true product-market fit.
To capture an executive's attention, connect operational-level problems to their strategic business impact. A slow development cycle isn't just a process issue; explain how it directly causes delayed time-to-market, higher costs, and lost market share to competitors, which are the metrics an economic buyer truly cares about.
The number one reason founders fail is not a lack of competence but a crisis of confidence that leads to hesitation. They see what needs to be done but delay, bogged down by excuses. In a fast-moving environment, a smart decision made too late is no longer a smart decision.
When stakeholders want to ship a high-fidelity prototype immediately, counter by explaining the required effort using numbers. Frame the work in terms of scale (e.g., "This must support 200 products, each requiring a week of testing") to manage expectations and justify proper engineering.
The misconception that discovery slows down delivery is dangerous. Like stretching before a race prevents injury, proper, time-boxed discovery prevents building the wrong thing. This avoids costly code rewrites and iterative launches that miss the mark, ultimately speeding up the delivery of a successful product.