The conventional wisdom that you must sacrifice one of quality, price, or speed is flawed. High-performance teams reject this trade-off, understanding that improving quality is the primary lever. Higher quality reduces rework and defects, which naturally leads to lower long-term costs and faster delivery, creating a virtuous cycle.
Related Insights
CEO Dylan Field combats organizational slowness by interrogating project timelines. He seeks to understand the underlying assumptions and separate actual work from "well-intentionally added" padding. This forces teams to reason from first principles and justify the true time required, preventing unnecessary delays.
The founders resolve the tension between speed and quality by being "obsessive." They move fast by iterating constantly, but also relentlessly go back and refine existing work. Speed is about the pace of iteration and a commitment to delight, not about shipping once and moving on.
Engineering often defaults to a 'project mindset,' focusing on churning out features and measuring velocity. True alignment with product requires a 'product mindset,' which prioritizes understanding the customer and tracking the value being delivered, not just the output.
Top product builders are driven by a constant dissatisfaction with the status quo. This mindset, described by Google's VP of Product Robbie Stein, isn't negative but is a relentless force that pushes them to question everything and continuously make products better for users.
True agility isn't just about sprints; it's psychological. By breaking massive projects into minimal viable products (MVPs) or small features, the team creates a steady stream of "quick wins." This builds a sense of progress and happiness—a "dopamine type of reward"—that keeps the wheel of innovation turning and prevents teams from getting bogged down.
The obsession with lean methodology has created a market of low-quality, uninspiring software. In this environment, building a polished, considered, and beautiful end-to-end product is no longer a luxury but a true competitive advantage that stands out and inspires users.
Instead of over-analyzing and philosophizing about process improvements, simply force the team to increase its cadence and ship faster. This discomfort forces quicker, more natural problem-solving, causing many underlying inefficiencies to self-correct without needing a formal change initiative.
When knowingly incurring tech debt to meet a deadline, trust between product and engineering is key. Don't just hope to fix it later; establish a formal agreement for an 'N+1 fast follow-up' release. This ensures time is explicitly scheduled to address the shortcuts taken.
When teams constantly struggle with prioritization, the root cause isn't poor backlog management. It's a failure of upstream strategic filters like market segmentation, pricing, and product discovery. Without these filters, the feature list becomes an unmanageable mess of competing demands.
The misconception that discovery slows down delivery is dangerous. Like stretching before a race prevents injury, proper, time-boxed discovery prevents building the wrong thing. This avoids costly code rewrites and iterative launches that miss the mark, ultimately speeding up the delivery of a successful product.
