ECB President Lagarde's statement that disinflation is over is likely a backward-looking comment on the progress from 10% inflation. However, the ECB’s own forward-looking forecasts project inflation will fall below its 2% target, suggesting that future rate cuts are more likely than the confident public rhetoric implies.
Related Insights
In 2026, major central banks will diverge significantly. The U.S. Fed and ECB are expected to cut rates in response to slowing growth and disinflation. In stark contrast, the Bank of Japan is poised to hike rates as it finally achieves reflation, making it the sole hawkish outlier among developed market central banks.
The Riksbank cut rates, but its forward guidance and a dissenter's vote signal a very high bar for future easing. The move, based on forward-looking inflation expectations rather than current data, effectively marks the end of the easing cycle and creates opportunities for carry trades.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, a rate cut is not automatically negative for a currency. In economies like Sweden or the Eurozone, a cut can be perceived as growth-positive, thereby supporting the currency. This contrasts with situations like New Zealand, where cuts are a response to poor data and are thus currency-negative, highlighting the importance of economic context.
The market is pricing in approximately three more rate cuts for next year, totaling around 110 basis points. However, J.P. Morgan's analysis, supported by the Fed's own dot plot, suggests only one additional cut is likely, indicating that current market pricing for easing is too aggressive.
Robert Kaplan argues that with inflation at 2.75-3%, the neutral Fed funds rate is ~3.5-3.75%. Since the current rate is 3.75-4%, another cut would place policy at neutral, not accommodative. This is a risky position when inflation remains well above the 2% target, leaving no room for error.
Policymakers can maintain market stability as long as inflation volatility remains low, even if the absolute level is above target. A spike in CPI volatility is the true signal that breaks the system, forces a policy response, and makes long-term macro views suddenly relevant.
The Fed's recent hawkish comments are likely a communication strategy to manage market certainty about a December rate cut, rather than a fundamental policy shift. The firm's economist still anticipates a cut, and the market prices in three cuts over 12 months, suggesting the overall easing backdrop remains intact for Emerging Markets.
The Fed's sudden dovish turn, despite admitting no new information was gathered, shows it reacts to immediate pressures like a weakening labor market rather than adhering to long-term inflation targets. This makes its forward guidance unreliable for investors.
Current rate cuts, intended as risk management, are not a one-way street. By stimulating the economy, they raise the probability that the Fed will need to reverse course and hike rates later to manage potential outperformance, creating a "two-sided" risk distribution for investors.
The disinflationary impact from goods prices has largely run its course in emerging markets. The remaining inflation is concentrated in the service sector, which is sticky and less responsive to monetary policy. This structural shift means the broad rate-cutting cycle is nearing its end, as central banks have limited tools to address services inflation.