Voting data from the NYC mayoral election reveals a stark divide. Residents born in the city largely rejected the socialist candidate. However, his victory was secured by overwhelming support from people who had lived in the city for less than 10 years, suggesting newcomers are more receptive to radical policies than longtime New Yorkers.
Related Insights
In a 2020 email, Thiel argued that high student debt and unaffordable housing would leave millennials with no stake in the capitalist system, inevitably causing them to turn against it. This prediction highlights the economic roots of modern political shifts among younger generations.
While socially problematic, residential clustering of minority groups is politically advantageous. Uniformly distributed minorities risk getting 0% of seats even with significant voter share, as they can't form a majority in any single district. Clustering allows them to secure representation by creating districts they can win.
Economic policies benefiting older, asset-owning generations at the expense of younger ones are reshaping politics. The traditional left-right divide is becoming less relevant than the conflict between classes, which is highly correlated with age, creating unusual political alliances between formerly opposed groups.
The growing appeal of socialism among the young is attributed to a "broken generational compact." As Peter Thiel predicted, when young people face crushing student debt and no path to homeownership, they lack a stake in the capitalist system and are more likely to turn against it, fueling movements like the one that elected a socialist mayor in NYC.
High-density urban living constantly confronts residents with visible wealth disparity, as they see neighbors who are more successful. This constant social comparison can trigger resentment and a sense of inequality, which in turn fuels the appeal of left-leaning policies aimed at redistribution.
The success of progressive candidate Momdani in New York stems from his singular focus on the city's unaffordability crisis. While other candidates emphasized crime, Momdani tapped into the core anxiety of voters who feel they can no longer afford to live there, signaling a shift in urban voter priorities.
A deep distrust of the bipartisan "neoliberal consensus" has made many young people receptive to any counter-narrative, whether from the left or right. This creates a powerful anti-establishment bloc that finds common ground in opposing the status quo, explaining the crossover appeal of populist figures.
When asked why "blue" cities are decaying, Rick Caruso offers a different take: it's not just about party. He argues that general voter apathy allows highly motivated "extremes" to elect ideologues. These officials prioritize ideology over practical results, leading to incompetence and stagnation regardless of their intentions.
Zoran Mondani built a TikTok following 150 times larger than his opponent's by using financial humor. He coined relatable terms like "halalflation" to explain complex economic issues to everyday people, demonstrating a powerful new playbook for political communication and voter engagement.
The conventional wisdom that moderate candidates are more electable is a myth. Elections are won by turnout, not by appealing to the median voter. A polarizing figure who excites their base will often win by a larger margin than a moderate who fails to generate enthusiasm.
