While apologies are crucial, over-apologizing can be detrimental. Research suggests that apologizing more than twice for the same issue in one conversation can act as a constant reminder of the transgression, bringing focus back to negativity instead of allowing progress.
Related Insights
Simply saying sorry or explaining your mistake is less effective than taking ownership and outlining a specific, measurable plan to change your behavior in the future. This provides a compelling signal of sincerity and allows the other person to see follow-through.
The biggest professional and personal problems often stem from a lack of candor. Withholding honest feedback to "keep the peace" is a destructive act that enables bad behavior and builds personal resentment over time. Delivering the truth, even when difficult, is a gift that addresses problems head-on and prevents future failure.
In difficult conversations, leaders fail when focused on their own feelings or ego. The real work is to get to the absolute truth of the situation. This involves moving past your own reaction to understand why the person acted as they did, if the behavior is correctable, and what would truly motivate them to change.
In difficult discussions, choosing not to respond is a powerful tool. It serves as a boundary on yourself to prevent a reactive, unhelpful comment and is a conscious choice when you recognize a conversation is unproductive. It's about control, not passivity.
Negative comments and actions are disproportionately powerful, acting like "poison in our system." Research by relationship expert John Gottman indicates that a 5:1 ratio of positive to negative interactions is required to maintain a healthy emotional bank account with colleagues, reports, or family.
The word "but" functions as a conversational eraser, negating whatever positive validation came before it and signaling an antagonistic stance. Replacing "but" with "and" allows you to add your perspective without dismissing theirs, maintaining a collaborative and receptive tone.
Based on a Zen story, "eating the blame" involves proactively apologizing for your part in a conflict, even when you feel your partner is more at fault. This emotionally counter-intuitive act breaks the cycle of defensiveness and creates space for resolution, making it a highly agentic move.
Borrowing from filmmaking, view communication slip-ups not as failures but as different "takes." This reframes errors as opportunities to try a different approach next time, reducing fear and encouraging experimentation and growth.
We often assume our message is received as intended, but this is a frequent point of failure in communication. The only thing that matters is what the listener understands. To ensure clarity and avoid conflict, proactively ask the other person to reflect back what they heard you say.
To slow down a heated or fast-paced conversation, avoid telling the other person to calm down. Instead, validate their emotional state by acknowledging it directly, e.g., 'I hear you have a lot of passion here.' This meta-commentary creates space and can de-escalate the intensity without being confrontational.
