While sectors like legal AI receive intense media and investor attention, the global manufacturing market represents a vastly larger, greenfield opportunity at $20 trillion versus legal's $1 trillion. This makes industrial AI one of the most attractive yet underserved problem spaces for founders.
While AI's market performance has been concentrated in the tech sector, its greatest future value will be unlocked as it transforms other industries like healthcare, logistics, and consumer goods. Buchwald believes investors are underestimating this broadening impact, which will create new winners and losers across the entire economy.
The primary economic incentive driving AI development is not replacing software, but automating the vastly larger human labor market. This includes high-skill jobs like accountants, lawyers, and auditors, representing a multi-trillion dollar opportunity that dwarfs the SaaS industry and dictates where investment will flow.
The true market opportunity for AI is not merely replacing existing software but automating human labor. This reframes the total addressable market (TAM) from the ~$400 billion global software industry to the $13 trillion US-only labor market, representing a thirty-fold increase in potential value.
While AI can improve existing software categories, the most significant opportunity lies in creating new applications that automate tasks previously performed by humans. This 'software eating labor' market is substantially larger than the traditional SaaS market, representing a massive greenfield opportunity for startups.
VC Joe Lonsdale argues investors are overly focused on software 'infinity stories' that could be worth trillions. Meanwhile, the 'real economy' (construction, quarrying, manufacturing) represents 85% of capital and is ripe for AI-driven transformation. These less-hyped applications represent a massive, misunderstood, and less competitive investment area.
For venture capitalists investing in AI, the primary success indicator is massive Total Addressable Market (TAM) expansion. Traditional concerns like entry price become secondary when a company is fundamentally redefining its market size. Without this expansion, the investment is not worthwhile in the current AI landscape.
Avoid trendy, saturated markets. Instead, focus on stable, 'boring' industries that are slow to innovate and still rely on manual processes. These markets are ripe for disruption, have less competition, and typically offer higher margins for AI solutions.
Don't underestimate the size of AI opportunities. Verticals like "AI for code" or "AI for legal" are not niche markets that will be dominated by a few players. They are entire new industries that will support dozens of large, successful companies, much like the broader software industry.
Elad Gil argues that the total addressable market for AI companies is not limited to traditional seat-based software pricing. Instead, it encompasses the multi-trillion dollar human labor market that AI can augment or automate.
The massive investment in AI seems disproportionate to the software market's size. However, its true potential is in automating and augmenting the services industry, which is 25 times larger than software, thus justifying the spend.