While AI's market performance has been concentrated in the tech sector, its greatest future value will be unlocked as it transforms other industries like healthcare, logistics, and consumer goods. Buchwald believes investors are underestimating this broadening impact, which will create new winners and losers across the entire economy.
Related Insights
The most significant societal and economic impact of AI won't be from chatbots. Instead, it will emerge from the integration of AI with physical robotics in sectors like manufacturing, logistics (Amazon), and autonomous vehicles (Waymo), which are currently under-hyped.
As AI infrastructure giants become government-backed utilities, their investment appeal diminishes like banks after 2008. The next wave of value creation will come from stagnant, existing businesses that adopt AI to unlock new margins, leveraging their established brands and distribution channels rather than building new rails from scratch.
Contrary to expectations, analysis shows that sectors with low profit per employee, such as healthcare and consumer staples, stand to gain the most from AI. High-tech firms already have very high profit per employee, so the relative impact of AI-driven efficiency is smaller.
If AI is truly transformational, its greatest long-term value will accrue to non-tech companies that adopt it to improve productivity. Historical tech cycles show that after an initial boom, the producers of a new technology are eventually outperformed by its adopters across the wider economy.
The focus on AI automating existing human labor misses the larger opportunity. The most significant value will come from creating entirely new types of companies that are fully autonomous and operate in ways we can't currently conceive, moving beyond simple replacement of today's jobs.
In 2026, the AI investment narrative will expand from foundational model creators to companies building applications and services. It also includes sectors enabling AI growth, such as energy generation and data centers, offering a wider range of investment opportunities beyond the initial tech giants.
VC Joe Lonsdale argues investors are overly focused on software 'infinity stories' that could be worth trillions. Meanwhile, the 'real economy' (construction, quarrying, manufacturing) represents 85% of capital and is ripe for AI-driven transformation. These less-hyped applications represent a massive, misunderstood, and less competitive investment area.
The AI investment case might be inverted. While tech firms spend trillions on infrastructure with uncertain returns, traditional sector companies (industrials, healthcare) can leverage powerful AI services for a fraction of the cost. They capture a massive 'value gap,' gaining productivity without the huge capital outlay.
The common analogy of AI being "like a website" that every company must adopt may be misleading. The real transformative power of AI could be in enabling entirely new, AI-native businesses that leapfrog incumbents, rather than simply being a feature tacked onto existing products.
The massive investment in AI seems disproportionate to the software market's size. However, its true potential is in automating and augmenting the services industry, which is 25 times larger than software, thus justifying the spend.
