Industries with historically low software adoption (like trial law or dentistry) are now viable markets. Instead of selling a tool, AI startups are selling an outcome—the automation of a specific labor role. This shifts the value proposition from a software expense to a direct labor cost replacement.

AI enables "software does labor" business models in industries previously deemed too small for specialized software, like dental offices or trial law. By replacing or augmenting specific labor tasks, startups can justify high-value contracts in markets that historically wouldn't pay for traditional SaaS tools.

The new generation of AI automates workflows, acting as "teammates" for employees. This creates entirely new, greenfield markets focused on productivity gains for every individual, representing a TAM potentially 10x larger than the previous SaaS era, which focused on replacing existing systems of record.

The primary economic incentive driving AI development is not replacing software, but automating the vastly larger human labor market. This includes high-skill jobs like accountants, lawyers, and auditors, representing a multi-trillion dollar opportunity that dwarfs the SaaS industry and dictates where investment will flow.

Companies like Sierra can't justify a 100x ARR valuation by targeting the existing software market (e.g., $8B Service Cloud). The bet is that they will capture a significant portion of the much larger human labor market ($200B+ for support agents). This represents a fundamental transition of spend from human capital to software.

The economic incentive for VCs funding AI is replacing human labor, a $13 trillion market in the US alone. This dwarfs the $300 billion SaaS market, revealing the ultimate goal is automating knowledge work, not just building software.

In the current market, AI companies see explosive growth through two primary vectors: attaching to the massive AI compute spend or directly replacing human labor. Companies merely using AI to improve an existing product without hitting one of these drivers risk being discounted as they lack a clear, exponential growth narrative.

The true market opportunity for AI is not merely replacing existing software but automating human labor. This reframes the total addressable market (TAM) from the ~$400 billion global software industry to the $13 trillion US-only labor market, representing a thirty-fold increase in potential value.

Elad Gil argues that the total addressable market for AI companies is not limited to traditional seat-based software pricing. Instead, it encompasses the multi-trillion dollar human labor market that AI can augment or automate.