Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Companies often complain about a lack of qualified candidates. The real issue is their failure to invest in developing the potential of hires who aren't 'perfect.' Talent development is a core organizational responsibility, not a luxury.

Related Insights

Many talent programs fail due to poor design. A successful architecture requires clarifying the program's 'Purpose' (the why), involving the right 'People', and providing consistent 'Proficiency' tools and templates to ensure follow-through and measurable results.

The most promising hires are often high-agency individuals constrained by their current environment—'caged animals' who need to be unleashed. Look for candidates who could achieve significantly more if not for their team or organization's limitations. This is a powerful signal of untapped potential and resourcefulness.

When hiring, prioritize a candidate's speed of learning over their initial experience. An inexperienced but rapidly improving employee will quickly surpass a more experienced but stagnant one. The key predictor of long-term value is not experience, but intelligence, defined as the rate of learning.

Most companies have a structured process for budgets and strategy but treat talent management as an afterthought. Implement a "people calendar" that systematically addresses attracting, developing, and engaging talent with the same discipline. This ensures people, your most critical asset, are managed proactively.

Delaying key hires to find the "perfect" candidate is a mistake. The best outcomes come from building a strong team around the founder early on, even if it requires calibration later. Waiting for ideal additions doesn't create better companies; early execution talent does.

Ramp's hiring philosophy prioritizes a candidate's trajectory and learning velocity ("slope") over their current experience level ("intercept"). They find young, driven individuals with high potential and give them significant responsibility. This approach cultivates a highly talented and loyal team that outperforms what they could afford to hire on the open market.

Organizations inadvertently foster negativity through a hypocritical hiring-to-management pipeline. They recruit candidates based on their potential and strengths but, once hired, immediately shift performance evaluation to focus on their gaps and weaknesses.

Top talent isn't attracted to chaos; they are attracted to well-run systems where they can have a massive impact. Instead of trying to "hire rockstars" to fix a broken system, focus on building a systematic, efficient company. This is the kind of environment the best people want to join.

Saying "we have a young team" is an excuse. A leader's obligation, per coach Barry Alvarez's advice, is to accelerate talent. Identify high-potential individuals and get them into critical roles, even if it means benching more experienced but lower-ceiling players. Don't wait for experience to accumulate.

Leaders who complain their team isn't as good as them are misplacing blame. They are the ones who hired and trained those individuals. The team's failure is ultimately the leader's failure in either talent selection, skill development, or both, demanding radical ownership.