Aspiring entrepreneurs often feel excluded by experienced founders, but this isn't 'gatekeeping.' It's a reaction to newcomers asking generic questions without first doing basic research via books, podcasts, or simple trial and error. The expectation is that you 'pay your dues' through self-education.
Related Insights
A full understanding of a complex industry's challenges can be paralyzing. The founder of Buildots admitted he wouldn't have started the company if he knew how hard it would be. Naivety allows founders to tackle enormous problems that experienced operators might avoid entirely.
The most vitriolic critics of your startup are almost never successful founders. People 'in the arena' understand the struggle and offer constructive feedback. Detractors are often 'in the stands,' tearing others down because they haven't experienced the challenges of building something worthwhile.
Lacking deep category knowledge fosters the naivety and ambition required for groundbreaking startups. This "beginner's mind" avoids preconceived limitations and allows for truly novel approaches, unlike the incrementalism that experience can sometimes breed. It is a gift, not a curse.
True growth and access to high-level opportunities come not from feigning knowledge, but from openly admitting ignorance. This vulnerability invites mentorship and opens doors to conversations where real learning occurs, especially in complex fields like investing, which may otherwise seem like a "scam."
Lacking a traditional resume forces young founders to constantly learn, as they have no preconceived notions of how things 'should' be done. This contrasts with experienced leaders who might wrongly assume their past success provides a playbook for a new market or company stage.
Instead of shutting out new founders or endlessly answering basic questions, experienced entrepreneurs should teach newcomers how to formulate better, more specific questions. This elevates the entire community by encouraging effort and critical thinking, without draining senior members' time and energy.
To foster a learning environment, especially for non-technical team members exploring code, rebrand "dumb questions" as "safe space questions." This linguistic shift removes judgment and encourages the fundamental inquiries necessary for beginners to grasp new technical concepts without fear.
The motivation to start a company wasn't about a guaranteed outcome but about embracing the ultimate test of one's capabilities. The realization that most founders, regardless of experience, are figuring it out as they go is empowering. It reframes the founder journey from a path for experts to a challenge for the determined.
The "CEO of the product" role at a large company involves managing the inertia of an already successful product. This is fundamentally different from founding, which requires creating value from nothing with no existing momentum. The skill sets are deceptively dissimilar.
