The "CEO of the product" role at a large company involves managing the inertia of an already successful product. This is fundamentally different from founding, which requires creating value from nothing with no existing momentum. The skill sets are deceptively dissimilar.
The paradigm shift with AI agents is from "tools to click buttons in" (like CRMs) to autonomous systems that work for you in the background. This is a new form of productivity, akin to delegating tasks to a team member rather than just using a better tool yourself.
Contrary to the belief that PMs are the earliest tech adopters, go-to-market functions (sales, marketing, support) are leading agent adoption. Their work involves frequently recurring, pattern-based tasks that are a perfect fit for automation, putting them ahead of the curve.
To prevent constant interruptions from automated tasks, schedule recurring AI agents to align with your work week. For example, receive competitive research on Fridays before planning and support summaries on Mondays before the team meeting. This integrates agent output into your natural workflow.
AI agent platforms are typically priced by usage, not seats, making initial costs low. Instead of a top-down mandate for one tool, leaders should encourage teams to expense and experiment with several options. The best solution for the team will emerge organically through use.
Staying lean is a deliberate product strategy. Bigger teams may build more features and go-to-market motions, but smaller, focused teams are better at creating simpler, more intuitive user experiences. Focus, not capital, is the key constraint for simplicity.
Use a two-axis framework to determine if a human-in-the-loop is needed. If the AI is highly competent and the task is low-stakes (e.g., internal competitor tracking), full autonomy is fine. For high-stakes tasks (e.g., customer emails), human review is essential, even if the AI is good.