Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

When revenue lags, the common reaction is to hire more reps. This compounds the problem by adding cost to a broken system. The correct sequence is to first diagnose commercial maturity, then fix the underlying infrastructure like sales processes, and only then add headcount capacity.

Related Insights

The default solution for growth is often hiring more salespeople. However, the more scalable path is investing in leveraged functions like sales enablement. This involves codifying the knowledge of top sellers and making that learning programmatic to ramp the entire sales organization more effectively.

When pipeline is down, the default reaction is to increase volume (more SDRs, more events). This is a flawed guess that ignores process efficiency. The real leverage comes from understanding the conversion effectiveness of existing activities, not just adding more inputs to a broken system.

Eric Samson's company initially hired closers and consultants focused on deal closing, only to realize they had no calls for them to handle. This highlights a critical error in building a sales function: you must solve for top-of-funnel lead generation before investing in bottom-of-funnel closing talent.

If you can't pay employees enough to retain them, the root cause is likely a flawed sales process, not a hiring issue. A weak sales motion prevents price increases, which suppresses profit margins and ultimately limits what you can afford to pay your team.

When planning growth, leaders often model sales capacity (hiring reps) but forget to model demand generation capacity. A plan to add eight reps is useless if the pipeline comes from non-scalable sources like VC intros, which can only support the first two reps. You must scale both simultaneously.

Analysis of over 100 sales organizations reveals the most common failures are fundamental gaps, not advanced technique issues. The top three culprits are low-quality discovery calls, promoted reps who lack management systems, and an ill-defined sales process with unclear stage definitions.

Don't hire more reps until your current team hits its productivity target (e.g., generating 3x their OTE). Scaling headcount before proving the unit economics of your sales motion is a recipe for inefficient growth, missed forecasts, and a bloated cost structure.

While adding reps seems like the fastest path to growth, true scalability comes from investing in leverage functions like enablement. A strong culture of accountability and programmatic training will unlock more revenue than simply hiring more bodies.

To get the biggest lift quickly, focus on improving sales management systems rather than training individual reps. It's easier and more scalable to coach 8-12 managers on effective practices, as their improvement will create a cascading positive effect on the entire 100-person sales team.

Sales processes become bloated over time, killing rep productivity. Instead of asking what to add, leaders should constantly ask what can be removed to achieve the same outcome. The best way to identify this friction is to be a rep for a day and experience the workflow firsthand.

Fix a Broken Sales Infrastructure Before Adding More Salespeople | RiffOn