Experienced product leaders avoid relying on muscle memory or applying a standard playbook. Each company, product space, and problem is unique. The most effective approach is to first understand the specific context and then select or create the right tools and frameworks for that unique situation.
Related Insights
Before building, founders in complex industries must deeply understand the operational rigor and nuances of their target vertical. This 'operator market fit' ensures the solution addresses real-world workflows, as a one-size-fits-all approach is doomed to fail.
Leaders often misapply successful playbooks from past roles. Instead of force-fitting, they should deconstruct the sales motion from first principles: who is the user, what's already working, and how do they *really* buy in this specific context? This ensures the playbook fits the new company's unique dynamics, especially in a PLG environment.
Product management is inherently chaotic due to constant context switching, ambiguity, and difficult stakeholder conversations. Success isn't about finding a perfect process, but developing the resilience to navigate this mess and guide teams from ambiguity to clarity.
Founders must consider their sales motion (e.g., PLG vs. enterprise sales-led) when designing the product. A product built for one motion won't sell effectively in another, potentially forcing a costly redesign. This concept extends "product-market fit" to "product-market-sales fit."
The solution to product management's current issues isn't another framework. It's a "mental flywheel": start with a mindset of pragmatism and curiosity, which fuels creative action. This cycle is sustained by resilience and emotional detachment to handle inevitable setbacks and criticism.
The old product leadership model was a "rat race" of adding features and specs. The new model prioritizes deep user understanding and data to solve the core problem, even if it results in fewer features on the box.
To move beyond static playbooks, treat your team's ways of working (e.g., meetings, frameworks) as a product. Define the problem they solve, for whom, and what success looks like. This approach allows for public reflection and iterative improvement based on whether the process is achieving its goal.
In a truly product-led company, the product organization must accept ultimate accountability for business-wide challenges. Issues in sales, marketing, or customer success are not separate functional problems; they are reflections of the product's shortcomings, requiring product leaders to take ownership beyond their immediate domain.
For net-new products, begin with deep problem discovery. Once a product is introduced, shift to rapid, solution-based iteration and feedback. As the product matures, revert back to problem discovery to find the next growth engine while optimizing the current product.
Apply product management skills like roadmapping and stakeholder management not just to a specific offering, but to the organization's strategy and the competitive landscape. This reframe leverages existing strengths for a wider, more strategic scope.
