The key mental shift in revenue transformation is moving from tactical questions about improving the current system to foundational questions about what a new system must be designed to do. This "systems thinking" approach separates change agents from operators who only tweak existing processes.
Leaders often misapply successful playbooks from past roles. Instead of force-fitting, they should deconstruct the sales motion from first principles: who is the user, what's already working, and how do they *really* buy in this specific context? This ensures the playbook fits the new company's unique dynamics, especially in a PLG environment.
Feeling exhausted from constantly defending your work isn't just burnout; it's a critical turning point. Effective leaders realize the problem isn't their tactics but the underlying data and measurement model itself, prompting a fundamental shift in focus from activity to infrastructure.
To create scalable offers that deliver results without you, shift from asking 'What do I know?' to 'What must my people do?'. Transformation comes from implementation, not just information. You must surface the hidden, instinctual actions and decisions that experts make to provide customers a clear path to results.
As a company grows, its old operational systems and processes ('plumbing') become obsolete. True scaling is not about addition; it's about reinvention. This involves systematically removing outdated processes designed for a smaller scale and replacing them entirely.
Many leaders view GTM systems as technological (e.g., Salesforce). Instead, think of it as a living ecosystem where changes in one part (e.g., sales) create cascading impacts on others (e.g., CS). This biological framing centers people and processes, not just tools, recognizing that the system is constantly evolving.
Instead of criticizing the current system, frame a data transformation project as a way to eliminate critical blind spots. Present leadership with specific, unanswerable questions that the new model can solve, linking visibility to tangible outcomes like higher performance and lower acquisition costs.
Leaders in 'panic mode' ask the wrong questions, focusing on external tactics ('What should I try next?'). The transformative shift is to turn inward and ask foundational questions like, 'What fundamental question am I not asking because I don't have the data to answer it?' This reorients strategy from copying to diagnosing.
The shift to systems-level thinking is triggered not by sudden clarity, but by a deep realization that success is impossible within the existing measurement framework. This occurs when leaders understand the risk of inaction and see clear examples of what a better system can achieve.
The path out of panic mode is not found by testing another tactic, which is the comfortable, familiar route. Real transformation requires leaders to embrace discomfort: challenging the status quo, admitting their data is flawed, and asking hard questions they can't yet answer. This discomfort is the necessary catalyst for strategic change.
Nubar Afeyan argues that companies should pursue two innovation tracks. Continuous innovation should build from the present forward. Breakthroughs, however, require envisioning a future state without a clear path and working backward to identify the necessary enabling steps.