The common instinct in a brand crisis is to repeatedly apologize. However, after acknowledging the mistake and the fix, the best path is to stop talking about it. Loyal customers want the brand to return to being trustworthy, and over-apologizing keeps the focus on the failure.

Related Insights

When faced with intense public scrutiny unrelated to the product, Astronomer's leadership focused all discussions on employee support and customer assurance. This internal focus prevented any employee or customer churn, demonstrating that the core business can remain stable by ignoring external noise.

In analyzing a public scandal, Scott Galloway notes that the greatest damage in a crisis typically isn't the initial event but the subsequent "shrapnel": the attempts to cover up, excuse, or avoid accountability. An effective response requires acknowledging the problem, taking responsibility, and overcorrecting.

When relaunching Lucozade with less sugar, openly discussing the change created a massive negative narrative. For Ribena's relaunch, they avoided mentioning the change and ran a positive campaign instead, leading to sales growth. Don't give consumers a reason to stop loving your brand.

While apologies are crucial, over-apologizing can be detrimental. Research suggests that apologizing more than twice for the same issue in one conversation can act as a constant reminder of the transgression, bringing focus back to negativity instead of allowing progress.

Instead of reacting defensively to negative press, the team reframed the situation as an opportunity. This mindset shift led them to stick to their plan and amplify the campaign's reach by focusing on positive business signals, rather than apologizing or retracting.

Trust can be destroyed in a single day, but rebuilding it is a multi-year process with no shortcuts. The primary driver of recovery is not a PR campaign but a consistent, long-term track record of shipping product and addressing user complaints. There are very few "spikes upward" in regaining brand trust.

During the Sydney Sweeney ad controversy, American Eagle's marketing team intentionally remained silent, contrary to typical crisis management advice. This allowed them to assess internal data and let the negative sentiment cycle burn out, which ultimately proved successful as public opinion swung back in their favor.

Instead of immediately issuing a statement during the backlash, American Eagle waited nine days. This delay created a vacuum that was filled by other people and media outlets questioning the absurdity of the claims, shifting public sentiment in the brand's favor before they even responded.

Don't hide from errors. Steve Munn found that when he made a mistake, taking ownership and handling it well actually enhanced client "stickiness" and deepened the relationship. Clients saw he cared and was accountable, building more trust than if the error never happened.

When handling an outage or escalation, the biggest threat to customer trust isn't the problem, but a chaotic internal response. Instill a "clarity over chaos" rule by designating one leader, one channel, and one message. A calm, owned response builds more credibility than a hundred smooth weeks.