In analyzing a public scandal, Scott Galloway notes that the greatest damage in a crisis typically isn't the initial event but the subsequent "shrapnel": the attempts to cover up, excuse, or avoid accountability. An effective response requires acknowledging the problem, taking responsibility, and overcorrecting.
Related Insights
The biggest professional and personal problems often stem from a lack of candor. Withholding honest feedback to "keep the peace" is a destructive act that enables bad behavior and builds personal resentment over time. Delivering the truth, even when difficult, is a gift that addresses problems head-on and prevents future failure.
True accountability extends beyond your own direct mistakes. Even when someone else is the cause of a problem, hold yourself responsible for having put yourself in that situation. This mindset empowers you to learn from the experience and avoid similar issues in the future by analyzing your choices.
Auntie Anne's founder Anne Beiler intentionally shared a damaging personal story on national TV. This preemptive move neutralized the information's power, ensuring future journalists couldn't use it as a "salacious" exposé. This strategy of "taking the air out of the balloon" protects long-term brand reputation by controlling the narrative from the start.
By openly admitting your inconsistencies while still advocating for a principle, you remove the deceptive claim to unearned status that angers people. This vulnerability prevents a 'gotcha' moment and fosters a more honest conversation, building trust and allowing imperfect people to advocate for important causes.
A strategic reason for a leader to resign is to de-escalate public tension. After a crisis, the leader can become a symbol of that difficult period. By stepping down, they absorb the negative sentiment, lower the political temperature, and allow their organization to move forward.
In a crisis, the instinct is to shout louder and match escalating chaos. True leadership involves 'energetic jujitsu': deliberately slowing down and bringing calmness to the situation. This rare skill is more powerful than simply increasing intensity.
In a crisis, the public knows no one has all the answers. Attempting to project absolute certainty backfires. A more effective strategy is "confident humility": transparently sharing information gaps and explaining that plans will evolve as new data emerges, which builds credibility.
While mainstream media covers the high-level controversy of a failed campaign, specialized trade publications dissect the granular, tactical mistakes. For practitioners, this peer review is often more damaging and insightful, as it judges the professional execution and ethical choices made behind the scenes.
Our culture equates accountability with punishment. A more powerful form of accountability is making someone a co-owner in solving the root problem. This ensures the issue doesn't recur and is the ultimate form of taking responsibility for one's actions.
During a crisis, a simple, emotionally resonant narrative (e.g., "colluding with hedge funds") will always be more memorable and spread faster than a complex, technical explanation (e.g., "clearinghouse collateral requirements"). This highlights the profound asymmetry in crisis communications and narrative warfare.
