The evolution of 'agentic AI' extends beyond content generation to automating the connective tissue of business operations. Its future value is in initiating workflows that span departments, such as kickstarting creative briefs for marketing, creating product backlogs from feedback, and generating service tickets, streamlining operational handoffs.

High productivity isn't about using AI for everything. It's a disciplined workflow: breaking a task into sub-problems, using an LLM for high-leverage parts like scaffolding and tests, and reserving human focus for the core implementation. This avoids the sunk cost of forcing AI on unsuitable tasks.

Instead of codebases becoming harder to manage over time, use an AI agent to create a "compounding engineering" system. Codify learnings from each feature build—successful plans, bug fixes, tests—back into the agent's prompts and tools, making future development faster and easier.

Top-performing engineering teams are evolving from hands-on coding to a managerial role. Their primary job is to define tasks, kick off multiple AI agents in parallel, review plans, and approve the final output, rather than implementing the details themselves.

Instead of focusing on foundational models, software engineers should target the creation of AI "agents." These are automated workflows designed to handle specific, repetitive business chores within departments like customer support, sales, or HR. This is where companies see immediate value and are willing to invest.

Instead of relying on a single, all-purpose coding agent, the most effective workflow involves using different agents for their specific strengths. For example, using the 'Friday' agent for UI tasks, 'Charlie' for code reviews, and 'Claude Code' for research and backend logic.

Borrowing from classic management theory, the most effective way to use AI agents is to fix problems at the earliest 'lowest value stage'. This means rigorously reviewing the agent's proposed plan *before* it writes any code, preventing costly rework later on.

The ideal AI-powered engineering workflow isn't just one tool, but a fluid cycle. It involves synchronous collaboration with an AI for planning and review, then handing off to an asynchronous agent for implementation and testing, before returning to synchronous mode for the next phase.

To maximize AI's impact, don't just find isolated use cases for content or demand gen teams. Instead, map a core process like a campaign workflow and apply AI to augment each stage, from strategy and creation to localization and measurement. AI is workflow-native, not function-native.