AI is restructuring engineering teams. A future model involves a small group of senior engineers defining processes and reviewing code, while AI and junior engineers handle production. This raises a critical question: how will junior engineers develop into senior architects in this new paradigm?

The most significant productivity gains come from applying AI to every stage of development, including research, planning, product marketing, and status updates. Limiting AI to just code generation misses the larger opportunity to automate the entire engineering process.

As AI agents handle technical execution, the most valuable human skill becomes ideation. Replit CEO Amjad Massad predicts this will dissolve rigid corporate hierarchies in favor of adaptable teams of generalists who collaborate with autonomous AI tools to bring ideas to life.

With AI agents automating raw code generation, an engineer's role is evolving beyond pure implementation. To stay valuable, engineers must now cultivate a deep understanding of business context and product taste to know *what* to build and *why*, not just *how*.

Instead of focusing on foundational models, software engineers should target the creation of AI "agents." These are automated workflows designed to handle specific, repetitive business chores within departments like customer support, sales, or HR. This is where companies see immediate value and are willing to invest.

The job of an individual contributor is no longer about direct execution but about allocation. ICs now act like managers, directing AI agents to perform tasks and using their judgment to prioritize, review, and integrate the output. This represents a fundamental shift in the nature of knowledge work.

As AI tools empower individuals to handle tasks across the entire product development lifecycle, traditional, siloed roles are merging. This fundamental shift challenges how tech professionals define their value and contribution, causing significant professional anxiety.

The key technical skill for an AI PM is not deep knowledge of model architecture but a higher-level understanding of how to orchestrate AI components. Knowing what AI can do and how systems connect is more valuable than knowing the specifics of fine-tuning or RAG implementation.

The traditional "assembly line" model of product development (PM -> Design -> Eng) fails with AI. Instead, teams must operate like a "jazz band," where roles are fluid, members "riff" off each other's work, and territorialism is a failure mode. PMs might code and designers might write specs.