The solution to systemic workplace exploitation and burnout is not individual self-help strategies. Author Sarah Jaffe argues that meaningful change in working conditions, hours, and pay has historically been achieved only through collective action, organization, and solidarity, where workers demand better terms together.
Related Insights
Due to demographic shifts and a post-pandemic re-evaluation of work, employees now hold more power. This requires a fundamental leadership mindset shift: from managing people and processes to enabling their success. High turnover and disengagement are no longer employee problems but leadership failures. A leader's success now depends entirely on the success of their team, meaning 'you work for them'.
Western culture's focus on hyper-individualism leads people to feel personally responsible for solving massive, systemic issues. This creates immense pressure and an illogical belief that one must find a perfect, individual solution to a problem that requires a collective response.
If you're miserable in a job but financially unstable, 'just quitting' is impractical. The solution is a 'practical quit': aggressively apply to hundreds of other jobs first. This channels frustration into massive action instead of dwelling in complaints. It prioritizes securing an alternative—even an imperfect one—before leaving a stable paycheck, combatting the inertia of complaining.
While ERGs provide community, they are structurally incapable of ensuring worker safety or advocating for material changes. As company-sponsored entities, they cannot collectively bargain or challenge employment conditions, making them projects of representation rather than instruments of worker power.
The narrative that personal problems require therapy pathologizes what are often systemic economic issues. You cannot "therapy your way out of material precarity." Structural solutions like higher wages, affordable housing, and a stronger social safety net are often more effective mental health policies than individual introspection.
Connective labor can be sustaining, not draining. Burnout occurs when the "social architecture" lacks support systems like "sounding boards" for practitioners to process their work. The problem isn't the emotional work itself, but the conditions under which it's performed.
America's mental health crisis is largely driven by economic precarity. Systemic solutions like a higher minimum wage, affordable housing, and universal healthcare would be more effective at improving population well-being than an individualistic focus on therapy, which often treats symptoms rather than the root cause of financial stress.
There is no universal standard for "balance." Instead of chasing a perfect equilibrium, entrepreneurs should communicate openly with partners about fluctuating work demands. Some weeks will be intense, while others can be dedicated to relationships. The key is intentionality and communication, not a static, mythical state.
An unexpected side effect of replacing human managers with "faceless AI systems" is the rise of collective action. When gig workers and others are managed by impersonal algorithms, it fosters solidarity against a common, non-human adversary, leading them to form unions and activist groups to reclaim human agency.
The modern idea that work should provide fulfillment is a recent concept that enables exploitation. As author Sarah Jaffe explains, it encourages workers to accept poor pay and blurred boundaries because the 'love' for the job is treated as a form of payment, allowing employers to capitalize on passion and creativity.