The modern idea that work should provide fulfillment is a recent concept that enables exploitation. As author Sarah Jaffe explains, it encourages workers to accept poor pay and blurred boundaries because the 'love' for the job is treated as a form of payment, allowing employers to capitalize on passion and creativity.
Many professionals continue down paths they dislike simply because they excel and receive external validation. This pattern of ignoring personal dissatisfaction for the sake of praise is a form of self-betrayal that systematically trains you to ignore your own inner guidance.
The solution to systemic workplace exploitation and burnout is not individual self-help strategies. Author Sarah Jaffe argues that meaningful change in working conditions, hours, and pay has historically been achieved only through collective action, organization, and solidarity, where workers demand better terms together.
Fields like nursing, teaching, and home health care have chronically low wages because they are culturally derived from 'women's work' historically done for free in the home. This legacy creates an implicit expectation that care, not compensation, should be the primary motivation, thus suppressing wages.
Modern education is complicit in widespread professional dissatisfaction by narrowly funneling students toward career tracks based on passion. This approach fails to equip individuals with the tools to discover their broader "life's work," a concept distinct from and more profound than a job.
The concept of a "calling" originated from religious vocations. Its application to secular work is a recent phenomenon, gaining traction with the rise of knowledge work in the 80s and 90s and peaking in the early 2000s, shifting the focus from divine service to personal fulfillment.
Passion has a dark side in the workplace. Highly passionate individuals are often less likely to negotiate their salary because they worry that bringing up money will make others doubt the authenticity of their commitment. This can lead to them being underpaid and exploited.
Society elevates pursuing passion to a moral good, which makes people feel they are 'bad' if they don't have one or choose to leave one. This pressure can trap individuals in unsuitable roles and denigrates other valid, meaningful life paths.
Employees who view their work as a calling are more willing to accept lower pay and make financial sacrifices. This passion makes them susceptible to exploitation, as organizations can implicitly substitute the promise of meaningful work for fair compensation and sustainable working conditions.
Entrepreneurs driven by external pressures like social status or financial gain, termed "obsessively passionate," are ironically less effective. This type of passion leads to a lack of boundaries, diminished focus, and an inability to balance other life roles, ultimately hindering business performance.
People with a strong calling don't just work harder out of sheer will. Research indicates the primary mechanism is increased enjoyment of the work itself. This positive feeling directly translates into greater effort on relevant tasks, supporting the "love what you do" axiom.