AI tools that provide directives without underlying context—"AI without the Why"—are counterproductive. An intent signal telling sales to target a company without explaining the reason (e.g., what they researched) leads to generic outreach, wasted effort, and ultimately, distrust in the technology.

Related Insights

When deploying AI tools, especially in sales, users exhibit no patience for mistakes. While a human making an error receives coaching and a second chance, an AI's single failure can cause users to abandon the tool permanently due to a complete loss of trust.

Using AI to generate content without adding human context simply transfers the intellectual effort to the recipient. This creates rework, confusion, and can damage professional relationships, explaining the low ROI seen in many AI initiatives.

Customers are hesitant to trust a black-box AI with critical operations. The winning business model is to sell a complete outcome or service, using AI internally for a massive efficiency advantage while keeping humans in the loop for quality and trust.

The massive increase in low-quality, AI-generated prospecting emails has conditioned buyers to ignore all outreach, even legitimate, personalized messages. This volume has eroded the efficiency gains the technology promised, making it harder for everyone to break through.

Brands using AI to write RFPs are a red flag. These documents are easy to spot and lack the specific, human insight needed for a quality response. Briefs should come directly from senior decision-makers to clearly articulate the business's actual needs.

To make B2B intent data tangible, use a retail store analogy. A prospect's digital behavior shows which 'section of the store' they are in. Pitching a solution unrelated to their demonstrated interest is like offering a discount on ties to someone looking at shirts—it's jarring and ineffective.

Generative AI tools are only as good as the content they're trained on. Lenovo intentionally delayed activating an AI search feature because they lacked confidence in their content governance. Without a system to ensure content is accurate and up-to-date, AI tools risk providing false information, which erodes seller trust.

A powerful framework for the human-AI partnership: AI provides the "intellectual capacity" (data, options, research), but the salesperson must serve as the "intellectual activator." Their irreplaceable role is applying strategic judgment and critical thinking to activate the information AI provides.

Many companies fail with AI prospecting because their outputs are generic. The key to success isn't the AI tool but the quality of the data fed into it and relentless prompt iteration. It took the speakers six months—not six weeks—to outperform traditional methods, highlighting the need for patience and deep customization with sales team feedback.

AI dramatically lowers the effort needed to find relevant prospecting information, but this is a double-edged sword. It empowers diligent reps to become hyper-relevant, but it also enables lazy reps to skip genuine effort and blast out slightly-better-but-still-generic messages. The tool amplifies the user's underlying work ethic.