Describing GovTech revenue as 'annually recurring' is misleading because government contracts are often legally prohibited from extending beyond a political administration's term. This makes traditional SaaS valuation models based on ARR fundamentally flawed for the GovTech space, forcing a different approach for founders and investors.
Related Insights
Zac Bookman argues that the high cost of sales, slower growth cycles, and customer preference for product suites make GovTech a better fit for private equity's long-term, operational focus than for venture capital's high-growth model.
Instead of ARR, Vulcan reports on 'total contract volume' (guaranteed money in signed deals) and annual cash collected. Softer but critical metrics include the number of states and agencies penetrated and, most importantly, how many times their product's requirements are written into law, creating an undeniable moat.
SaaS companies often use the traditional top-down sales funnel as their mental model. However, this model is fundamentally flawed because it ends at the 'close' and completely ignores the recurring revenue component, which is the lifeblood of SaaS. The 'bow tie' model is a more accurate representation.
Founders often mistake $1M ARR for product-market fit. The real milestone is proven repeatability: a predictable way to find and win a specific customer profile who reliably renews and expands. This signal of a scalable business model typically emerges closer to the $5M-$10M ARR mark.
For owners planning a future exit, the MSP model is far superior to a reseller's project-to-project structure. The stable, predictable monthly recurring revenue (MRR) from multi-year contracts is highly attractive to investors, creating a sellable asset independent of the owner's sales prowess.
With Seed-to-A conversion below 20%, VCs are intensely vetting revenue quality. They are wary of "vibe ARR" inflated by pilots, credits, or non-recurring fees. Founders must demonstrate true, sticky recurring revenue with high customer loyalty and switching costs to secure a Series A.
Dynamic Signal generated millions in ARR, but analysis revealed customers treated the product like a one-off media buy, not a recurring software subscription. The high revenue hid an unsustainable, services-based model with low lifetime value.
Beyond outright fraud, startups often misrepresent financial health in subtle ways. Common examples include classifying trial revenue as ARR or recognizing contracts that have "out for convenience" clauses. These gray-area distinctions can drastically inflate a company's perceived stability and mislead investors.
Brett Taylor argues that focusing solely on rapid growth can lead to 'fragile ARR.' The better metric is 'earned ARR,' which reflects sticky, high-quality revenue from satisfied customers and indicates a more durable business with a real moat.
While impressive, hypergrowth from zero to $100M+ ARR can be a red flag. The mechanics enabling such speed, like low-friction monthly subscriptions, often correlate with low switching costs, weak product depth, and poor long-term retention, resembling consumer apps more than enterprise SaaS.
