In a diverse, multi-ethnic country, national identity cannot be based on ancestry or "bloodline." Instead, it can be rooted in a shared abstract value. Canada's unifying identity is positioned as "freedom"—the common reason people have historically immigrated, providing a non-ethnic foundation for unity.

The UK government's policy makes a critical category error by conflating concern over cultural erosion from non-assimilating migration (cultural nationalism) with ideologies of racial superiority (white supremacism). One is a defense of shared societal values, while the other is based on bigotry, and treating them as the same is a dangerous oversimplification.

Resistance to mass immigration is often mislabeled as racism when it's a defense of cultural uniqueness. The core fear is that blending all cultures creates a bland 'beige' monolith, ultimately allowing the most aggressive and cohesive incoming culture to dominate.

Western education systems have spent decades teaching students that nationalism is dangerous and universal humanity is the true political community. This creates a strategic weakness, as states cannot expect these same generations to instantly adopt a strong national identity and be willing to fight for their country when a geopolitical crisis demands it.

Immigration's success or failure is determined by values alignment, not ethnicity. The US historically integrated diverse groups because they shared a foundational ethos. Current conflicts arise when immigrant populations hold fundamentally different core values from the host nation, creating societal friction regardless of race.

Focusing on immigration misses a deeper issue: a systemic failure to inculcate core American values in both children and newcomers. A nation with a "distressing number of people... that hate America" becomes internally weak and vulnerable to fragmentation, regardless of its border policies.

A multi-ethnic society, where diverse groups integrate into a shared national culture, is viable. The problem lies with the ideology of multiculturalism, which denies the existence of a core British identity. This fosters division and undermines the social cohesion necessary to overcome national challenges.

Culture isn't about values listed on a wall; it's the sum of daily, observable behaviors. To build a strong culture, leaders must define and enforce specific actions that embody the desired virtues, especially under stress. Abstract ideals are useless without concrete, enforced behaviors.

Britain is modeling its new asylum system on Denmark's, even though Denmark is far less successful at integrating immigrants into its society and workforce. This strategic shift risks importing Denmark's integration failures in an attempt to deter new arrivals and address political pressures from populist parties.