A great founding engineer may not be the right person to be CTO of a larger team. Recognizing this misfit can lead to a mutual, amicable departure where the exiting co-founder retains their fully vested equity, preserving the relationship and acknowledging their early contribution.
Related Insights
The most powerful incentive for increasing employee ownership is to make founder exits to their employees tax-free. This aligns financial self-interest with a social good, making it more profitable for a founder to sell to their team than to private equity.
Don't default to a 50/50 split on day one. Instead, agree to formally discuss equity only after reaching a predefined milestone, like $10,000 in revenue. This allows you to base the split on demonstrated contribution and commitment, avoiding the resentment from premature, misaligned agreements.
Co-founder conflict often arises when one founder (e.g., go-to-market) has deep customer exposure while the other (e.g., technical) operates on secondhand information. This "context gap" leads to strategic misalignment and frustration, causing teams to split.
To scale his company Exit Five, the founder (the "Visionary") promoted his COO to CEO (the "Integrator"). This structure, from the book *Traction*, allows the creator to focus on ideas and content while the operator runs the business, manages the team, and implements processes.
The founder's number one piece of advice is to get the co-founder relationship right. While you can pivot ideas, raise more funding, or change markets, replacing a co-founder is incredibly difficult. A strong, complementary founding team is the foundation for overcoming all other startup challenges.
To ensure a smooth leadership handover, John Zimmer transitioned from an operating role to a board seat before fully departing Lyft. This deliberate, two-year process provided stability and support for the company's new leadership team during its next chapter.
The founders credit their successful partnership to an equal commitment to hard work. By dividing responsibilities and working independently before collaborating ('divide and conquer'), they ensure an even playing field and avoid the common pitfalls of co-founder burnout or resentment that often ruin business friendships.
Granting a full co-founder 50% equity is a massive, often regrettable, early decision. A better model is to bring on a 'partner' with a smaller, vested equity stake (e.g., 10%). This provides accountability and complementary skills without sacrificing majority ownership and control.
To avoid resentment when hiring over an early employee, use the 'Giving Away Your Legos' framework from First Round Capital. It reframes the transition as a necessary and positive part of scaling, where everyone gives up parts of their job to enable company growth.
Marshall Haas sold a controlling stake in his company but retained significant equity. His goal was not just a cash payout, but to create a structure that provided ongoing cash flow, a continued advisory role, and a way to avoid the boredom and financial anxiety that often follows a complete, all-or-nothing exit.
