The 21st-century geopolitical contest is not a symmetric USA vs. China rivalry, but an asymmetric conflict between China’s vertically integrated state (CCP) and the decentralized internet (BTC). As the U.S. declines, Bitcoin represents a fundamentally different and more resilient alternative order.
The competition in AI infrastructure is framed as a binary, geopolitical choice. The future will be dominated by either a US-led AI stack or a Chinese one. This perspective positions edge infrastructure companies as critical players in national security and technological dominance.
Despite different political systems, the US and Chinese internets have converged because power is highly centralized. Whether it's a government controlling platforms like Weibo or tech oligarchs like Elon Musk controlling X, the result is a small group dictating the digital public square's rules.
The next major ideological battle will be for the allegiance of Chinese technologists. The Chinese state will appeal to them based on nationalism and race ('as a Chinese'), while the decentralized internet will appeal to them based on a global, technologist class identity.
China is engaging in economic warfare by systematically reducing its holdings of US debt. This strategy targets the foundation of the US economy, which is 70% based on debt-fueled spending. By simultaneously pushing a gold-backed digital yuan, China aims to undermine the dollar's reserve status.
Governments fund wars with opaque money printing. Because Bitcoin cannot be printed, it would force leaders to use direct taxation, which citizens would resist. Its unseizable nature also removes the economic incentive of conquering nations for their reserves.
As America's global dominance wanes, power is bifurcating into two distinct successor empires. China is winning the physical world of manufacturing and military hardware. Simultaneously, the internet is winning the digital world of media (AI, social) and money (crypto, smart contracts). This succession has already occurred but has not been fully priced in by global markets.
In a de-dollarizing, low-trust geopolitical landscape, Bitcoin's core value isn't as a currency but as a digitally native, government-proof form of collateral. Unlike gold or treasuries, it's instantly transferable and cannot be confiscated by a hostile sovereign power, making it a superior neutral asset.
A dominant system, like the Soviet Union, doesn't simply die; it collapses when its people can envision and transition to a viable alternative (e.g., the US model). The current US-led order faces multiple potential successors—crypto, China's centralized model—which accelerates its potential decline.
The decline of the US dollar won't result in a simple replacement by the Chinese Yuan. Instead, its core functions are fracturing: 'store of value' is shifting to gold and Bitcoin, while 'medium of exchange' is moving to a multi-polar system of local currencies like the rupee and yuan.
The U.S. government is actively promoting stablecoins and U.S.-based AI to extend its global influence. This strategy shifts from projecting power through military presence to technological and financial dominance, ensuring the dollar and American culture remain central to the global system.