A dominant system, like the Soviet Union, doesn't simply die; it collapses when its people can envision and transition to a viable alternative (e.g., the US model). The current US-led order faces multiple potential successors—crypto, China's centralized model—which accelerates its potential decline.
Related Insights
Financial and political systems can unravel at an exponential pace. The collapse of SVB took two days to trigger a $300B printing, while the USSR went from superpower to non-existent in just two years. This highlights the danger of slow reaction times, where waiting for clear signals means it's already too late.
While societal decline can be a long, slow process, it can unravel rapidly. The tipping point is when the outside world loses confidence in a nation's core institutions, such as its legal system or central bank. This triggers a sudden flight of capital, talent, and investment, drastically accelerating the collapse.
The centralizing technologies of the 20th century (mass media, mass production) are being superseded by decentralizing ones (internet, crypto). This is causing history to "run in reverse," with modern events mirroring 19th-century patterns like the rise of robber baron-like figures and the fracturing of empires.
The primary risk for the U.S. is not the inevitable decline of the dollar's dominance, which could rebalance the economy. The danger lies in trying to fight this trend, leading to a disorderly and painful collapse rather than a graceful, managed transition from a position of strength.
While past empires collapsed from debt and money printing, Arthur Laffer argues America's system is different. Its democratic processes, free markets, and checks and balances create a more flexible structure. This allows for self-correction (like Reagan following Carter), a feature that more rigid historical empires lacked.
As America's global dominance wanes, power is bifurcating into two distinct successor empires. China is winning the physical world of manufacturing and military hardware. Simultaneously, the internet is winning the digital world of media (AI, social) and money (crypto, smart contracts). This succession has already occurred but has not been fully priced in by global markets.
The US dollar reached its peak global dominance in the early 2000s. The world is now gradually shifting to a system where multiple currencies (like the euro and yuan) and neutral assets (like gold) share the role of reserve currency, marking a return to a more historically normal state.
Each time the U.S. uses financial sanctions, it demonstrates the risks of relying on the dollar system. This incentivizes adversaries like Russia and China to accelerate the development of parallel financial infrastructure, weakening the dollar's long-term network effect and dominance.
Historian Sven Beckert frames capitalism as a constantly shape-shifting system. Its dramatic evolution over 1,000 years—from colonial models to Keynesianism—suggests the current neoliberal order is not a permanent state but will likely be replaced by a substantially different version.
The decline of the US dollar won't result in a simple replacement by the Chinese Yuan. Instead, its core functions are fracturing: 'store of value' is shifting to gold and Bitcoin, while 'medium of exchange' is moving to a multi-polar system of local currencies like the rupee and yuan.