Businesses often design for internal processes and efficiency, creating a series of disconnected handoffs (e.g., in a hospital or restaurant). This forces the customer to maintain the coherence of their own journey, resulting in a fragmented, unloving, and ineffective experience that ultimately harms outcomes.

Related Insights

Businesses often focus on brand (awareness) and growth (acquisition), but the most profitable engine is customer experience. This includes retention, upselling, cross-selling, referrals, and reviews. Systematizing this third engine builds sustainable momentum and profit.

Customers interact with a company as a single entity, but internally, separate departments like sales and support optimize for their own conflicting metrics. This creates a confusing and inefficient experience, a direct result of Conway's Law in action.

Brainstorming cannot reveal the true friction in your customer experience. Following JetBlue's example, leaders must regularly become their own customers. This practice uncovers how high-level decisions inadvertently create flaws in the customer journey that are invisible from the boardroom.

Franchised or licensed locations, like airport Starbucks, often operate on separate databases from the parent company. This siloing prevents a unified, AI-driven experience (e.g., mobile ordering), prioritizing short-term profit and efficiency over a consistent, high-quality customer experience, ultimately damaging the brand.

An engineering mindset prizes efficiency, but humanity prizes soulfulness. The most desirable experiences—from cuisine to travel—are deliberately inefficient. Building a beloved brand requires embracing this paradox and understanding that emotional connection is built on non-utilitarian details.

Citing CX expert Gene Bliss, the guest advises against perfecting every touchpoint. Instead, leaders must identify the few critical moments in the customer journey where failure is "game over" for the relationship. It's more effective to perfect these moments while accepting mediocrity in less critical areas.

Every leader is inherently an "experience maker," whether skilled or not. If you don't intentionally design a holistic experience for customers or employees, you will create one by default through drift and disconnected processes, which is often negative. The question isn't *if* you make experiences, but *how well* you do it.

Businesses often fail to spot points of friction in their own customer journey because they are too familiar with their processes. This "familiarity bias" makes them blind to the confusing experience a new customer faces. The key is to actively step outside this autopilot mode and see the experience with fresh eyes.

Organizing by function (e.g., all sales together) seems efficient but incentivizes teams to optimize their individual metrics, not the company's success. This sub-optimization prevents cross-functional learning and leads to blame games, ultimately harming the entire customer value stream and creating a non-learning organization.

When serving a complex value chain, internal operational efficiency is not just a background task. Inefficient internal processes can completely break the customer experience, making features for internal teams (e.g., operations, procurement) just as high-priority as those facing the end customer.