John McWhorter predicts that political pushback against DEI won't eliminate the practices. Instead, institutions will simply stop using the "DEI" label overtly. The underlying ideology and goals, such as racial preferences, will persist through new euphemisms and less visible methods, making the change superficial.

Elite universities with massive endowments and shrinking acceptance rates are betraying their public service mission. By failing to expand enrollment, they function more like exclusive 'hedge funds offering classes' that manufacture scarcity to protect their brand prestige, rather than educational institutions aiming to maximize societal impact.

DEI initiatives face resistance when historically privileged groups don't understand the systemic barriers ('the fence') others face. Proactively explaining why some need more support ('rocks') is crucial to show it's about fairness, not preferential treatment, ultimately benefiting everyone when the fence is removed.

Relying on moral imperatives alone often fails to change entrenched hiring behaviors. Quotas, while controversial, act as a necessary catalyst by mandating different actions. This forces organizations to break the cycle of inertia and groupthink that perpetuates homogenous leadership.

Policies preventing employers from asking about criminal records early in the hiring process backfired. Unable to see an applicant's record, some employers resorted to guessing based on demographics, leading to increased discrimination against young Black men who had no criminal record. This highlights the need to 'fail fast' and test policies before wide implementation.

A policy at Stanford offering advantages like extra time for disabled students has resulted in half the student body claiming disability status. This illustrates how well-intentioned policies can create perverse incentives that undermine meritocracy.

As athletic departments divert all funds to football and basketball, they cut non-revenue sports like swimming, track, and gymnastics. These programs are not just extracurriculars; they are the primary, and often only, training ground for America's future Olympic athletes.

Most elite universities measure quality by their low acceptance rates. ASU's President Michael Crow flipped this model, defining success by the number of students they include and support, arguing that exclusivity is an outdated, elitist metric that ill-serves a democracy.

There is a significant hypocrisy in elite university admissions. While affirmative action for historically disadvantaged groups is highly controversial, these same institutions give equal or larger admissions breaks to athletes in niche, wealthy sports like fencing and rowing, a practice that receives far less public scrutiny.