Constant exposure to scandals and amoral leaders creates a deep societal yearning for basic decency and good character in public figures. The value of having trustworthy role models in power becomes starkly apparent only in their absence, making it an underrated commodity.
Related Insights
Public figures' careers follow a predictable arc of rise, excitement, and eventual controversy. Their survival depends on a simple equation: if the drama of their downfall is more interesting or valuable to the public than their actual contributions, their career is effectively over.
The appeal of a populist leader lies in their rejection of traditional political norms. When the electorate feels betrayed by the established "political class," they gravitate toward figures whose rhetoric is a deliberate and stark contrast, signaling they are an outsider.
Citing the Arabic proverb "people are as their kings are," UAE Minister Omar Al Olama argues that a leader's personal conduct sets the standard for society. If a leader is corrupt, the people will be corrupt; if generous, the people will be generous. Culture and ethics flow directly from the top.
People are more infuriated by hypocrisy than by open corruption. Because a figure like Trump doesn't pretend to adhere to any ethical norms, he can't be accused of being a hypocrite. This blatant shamelessness acts as a shield, making traditional attacks based on norm violations ineffective.
When public figures violate long-held social contracts, like showing respect for the recently deceased, it's more dangerous than the act itself. It signals a fracturing of the shared cultural grace and unspoken rules that provide societal stability.
Stakeholders demand courageous leadership but foster a culture of intolerance. By failing to distinguish between major offenses and minor infractions and "canceling" leaders for mistakes, the public itself disincentivizes the very courage and authenticity it seeks, creating a paralyzing circular problem.
The lack of basic manners and civil discourse among public servants sets a powerful negative example for society. This leadership failure normalizes poor behavior, contributing to a decline in everyday courtesy and respect among citizens, such as not offering a seat to the elderly.
Major political realignments are not always triggered by specific crimes but by a pervasive 'vibe' of elite entitlement and impunity. Revelations that expose a culture of being above the law can act as a societal 'let them eat cake moment,' sparking a revolutionary shift in public sentiment and policy priorities.
The Jeffrey Epstein case illustrates how a lack of institutional oversight creates power vacuums. These vacuums are filled by bad actors who use favors and influence to corrupt leaders across politics, business, and academia, undermining democratic structures.
Leaders who immediately frame issues through a lens of core values, such as constitutionality, build more trust than those who calculate a politically palatable position. The public can detect inauthenticity, making a principles-first approach more effective long-term, even if it seems risky in the short term. Leaders should bring people along to their principled position.
