Money is not just a medium of exchange; it is a core social technology that allows individuals to influence others' actions without resorting to violence. When monetary systems fail, society reverts to a state where physical power dictates outcomes.
The loss of unifying religious morality created an initial societal void. Social media then amplified this by exposing people to a tsunami of viewpoints, resulting in an 'infinite fracturing of frame of reference' and the creation of countless micro-tribes that erode social cohesion.
Whether in old industries like oil or new ones like AI, amassing massive wealth attracts a personality type willing to eliminate threats to protect their power. This dynamic is about the psychology of power itself, not the specific industry a company operates in.
Investors often believe their analysis is correct even if their timing is off, leading to losses. The reality is that in markets, timing is not a separate variable; it's integral to being right. A poorly timed but eventually correct bet still results in a total loss.
When public figures violate long-held social contracts, like showing respect for the recently deceased, it's more dangerous than the act itself. It signals a fracturing of the shared cultural grace and unspoken rules that provide societal stability.
History demonstrates a direct, causal link between widening inequality and violent societal collapse. When a large portion of the population finds the system unbearable, it leads to events like the French Revolution—a blunt cause-and-effect relationship often sanitized in modern discourse.
In a democracy with massive debt, reckless government spending becomes inevitable. The electorate will consistently vote for short-term relief (money printing, free programs) over the long-term pain of austerity, making fiscal irresponsibility a predictable outcome of human nature.
Pausing or regulating AI development domestically is futile. Because AI offers a winner-take-all advantage, competing nations like China will inevitably lie about slowing down while developing it in secret. Unilateral restraint is therefore a form of self-sabotage.
The suspicious death of an MIT fusion researcher echoes historical patterns, like Nikola Tesla's suppression, where breakthrough technologies threatening established industries (e.g., energy) face violent opposition from powerful incumbents like 'Big Oil'.
In an economy where currency is being systematically devalued through money printing, holding cash is a losing strategy. The only way to preserve wealth is to own a diverse basket of 12-15 uncorrelated assets (e.g. stocks, commodities, real estate) that are subject to different economic pressures.