The economy's apparent strength is misleadingly concentrated. Growth hinges on AI-related capital expenditures and spending by the top 20% of households. This narrow base makes the economy fragile and vulnerable to a single shock in these specific areas, as there is little diversity to absorb a downturn.
Related Insights
While there's a popular narrative about a US manufacturing resurgence, the massive capital spending on AI contradicts it. By consuming a huge portion of available capital and accounting for half of GDP growth, the AI boom drives up the cost of capital for all non-AI sectors, making it harder for manufacturing and other startups to get funded.
A recent Harvard study reveals the staggering scale of the AI infrastructure build-out, concluding that if data center investments were removed, current U.S. economic growth would effectively be zero. This highlights that the AI boom is not just a sector-specific trend but a primary driver of macroeconomic activity in the United States.
Recent job growth is overwhelmingly concentrated in healthcare services (83% of new NFP jobs) for an aging population. This, combined with an AI capex bubble, reveals a non-dynamic, 'K-shaped' economy where 'Main Street' stagnates and growth depends on narrow, unsustainable drivers.
The AI boom's economic impact extends beyond direct investment. With AI plays driving 80% of stock market gains, a powerful 'wealth effect' is created. This disproportionately benefits the top 10% of earners, who in turn drive the majority of US consumer spending, fueling the broader economy.
The US economy is not broadly strong; its perceived strength is almost entirely driven by a massive, concentrated bet on AI. This singular focus props up markets and growth metrics, but it conceals widespread weakness in other sectors, creating a high-stakes, fragile economic situation.
The U.S. economy can no longer be analyzed as a single entity. It has split into two distinct economies: one for the thriving top tier (e.g., AI and tech) and another for the struggling bottom 60%. The entire system now depends on spending from the rich; if they stop, the economy collapses.
The top 10% of earners, who drive 50% of consumer spending, can slash discretionary purchases overnight based on stock market fluctuations. This makes the economy more volatile than one supported by the stable, non-discretionary spending of the middle class, creating systemic fragility.
The global economy's reliance on a few dominant tech companies creates systemic risk. Unlike a robust, diversified economy, a downturn in a single key player like NVIDIA could trigger a disproportionately severe global recession, described as 'stage four walking pneumonia.' This concentration makes the entire system fragile.
The top 10% of US earners now drive nearly half of all consumer spending. This concentration suggests the macro-economy and stock market can remain strong even if AI causes significant unemployment for the other 90%, challenging the assumption that widespread job loss would automatically trigger an economic collapse.
With the top 10% of earners accounting for half of all consumer spending, the U.S. economy has become dangerously top-heavy. This concentration creates systemic risk, as a stock market downturn or even a minor shift toward caution among this small group could trigger a sharp recession, with no offsetting demand from the rest of the population.